» Articles » PMID: 22182972

Tumor Control Versus Adverse Events with Targeted Anticancer Therapies

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2011 Dec 21
PMID 22182972
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The advent of targeted anticancer therapies over the past few decades has reinvigorated the field of cancer therapeutics, with the promise of increased cancer cure rates accompanied by decreased toxicity. But, has that promise been fulfilled? The short answer is definitely 'no', both because of disappointing tumor responses and unexpectedly high toxicity, as well as the extremely high financial cost of these agents. However, failing to completely fulfill initial promise does not mean that targeted therapies should be abandoned. Increased progression-free survival might ultimately lead to increased overall survival, and targeted therapies have changed the course of cancers such as breast, lung and renal. Therefore, we would argue that despite some disappointments, targeted therapies have a vital role in future cancer treatment. This Review will discuss the positives and negatives of targeted agents, and propose a way to optimize their use and development to ensure proper personalized cancer medicine that tailors not only the anticancer treatment, but also the antitoxicity strategies, to achieve the best outcome for the patient in terms of both quality and quantity of life.

Citing Articles

Trajectories of depression and predictors in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: growth mixture model.

Luo Y, Mao D, Zhang L, Zhu B, Yang Z, Miao J BMC Psychiatry. 2024; 24(1):578.

PMID: 39182063 PMC: 11344456. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-06029-y.


Population Pharmacokinetics of Trametinib and Impact of Nonadherence on Drug Exposure in Oncology Patients as Part of the Optimizing Oral Targeted Anticancer Therapies Study.

Ravix A, Bandiera C, Cardoso E, Lata-Pedreira A, Chtioui H, Decosterd L Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(12).

PMID: 38927898 PMC: 11201946. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16122193.


Cancer Drug Resistance: Targeting Proliferation or Programmed Cell Death.

Sazonova E, Yapryntseva M, Pervushin N, Tsvetcov R, Zhivotovsky B, Kopeina G Cells. 2024; 13(5.

PMID: 38474352 PMC: 10930385. DOI: 10.3390/cells13050388.


Towards UGT1A1 guided irinotecan dosing.

Hicks J Eur J Hum Genet. 2023; 31(9):980-981.

PMID: 36750665 PMC: 10474121. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01306-y.


Personalized Targeted Therapeutic Strategies against Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. An Evidence-Based Review of Literature.

Cao M, Shi E, Wang H, Mao L, Wu Q, Li X Int J Nanomedicine. 2022; 17:4293-4306.

PMID: 36134201 PMC: 9484769. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S377816.


References
1.
Grosse S . Assessing cost-effectiveness in healthcare: history of the $50,000 per QALY threshold. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010; 8(2):165-78. DOI: 10.1586/14737167.8.2.165. View

2.
Chen Z, Wang C, Xu X, Feng W . Cost-effectiveness study comparing imatinib with interferon-alpha for patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) from the Chinese public health-care system perspective (CPHSP). Value Health. 2010; 12 Suppl 3:S85-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00635.x. View

3.
Abernethy A, Ahmad A, Zafar S, Wheeler J, Reese J, Lyerly H . Electronic patient-reported data capture as a foundation of rapid learning cancer care. Med Care. 2010; 48(6 Suppl):S32-8. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181db53a4. View

4.
Walraven M, Witteveen P, Lolkema M, van Hillegersberg R, Voest E, Verheul H . Antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibition related gastrointestinal perforations: a case report and literature review. Angiogenesis. 2010; 14(2):135-41. PMC: 3102838. DOI: 10.1007/s10456-010-9197-6. View

5.
Lacouture M, Maitland M, Segaert S, Setser A, Baran R, Fox L . A proposed EGFR inhibitor dermatologic adverse event-specific grading scale from the MASCC skin toxicity study group. Support Care Cancer. 2010; 18(4):509-22. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-009-0744-x. View