Mammography in the Eighties
Authors
Affiliations
Mammography has experienced the greatest change of any existing radiologic examination in recent years. In 1985, as a part of the Nationwide Evaluation of X-Ray Trends (NEXT) program, a national survey was conducted of a statistically selected sample (n = 232) of facilities performing mammography examinations in the United States. By 1988, the number of mammography facilities in the United States had increased to over 6,400, an increase of over 60% from the 1985 level. To assess the consequence of this expansion as well as the impact of recent technological and other significant developments on mammography, a NEXT survey of mammography facilities was repeated in 1988 (n = 226). Screen-film mammography accounted for 83% of the facilities surveyed in 1988, and dedicated equipment dominated screen-film systems (99%). There was a 26% increase in the overall mean phantom image score, over 45% increase in the use of grids, and 10% increase in mean glandular dose for systems using grids.
Reporting breast density on chest computed tomography.
Beizavi Z, Desperito E, Capaccione K, Patrizio R, Salvatore M Transl Breast Cancer Res. 2024; 4:24.
PMID: 38751487 PMC: 11093103. DOI: 10.21037/tbcr-23-36.
Change Is Good: The Evolution and Future of Breast Imaging.
Moy L Radiology. 2023; 306(3):e230018.
PMID: 36803001 PMC: 9968764. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.230018.
Thierry-Chef I, Simon S, Weinstock R, Kwon D, Linet M Radiat Res. 2011; 177(1):92-108.
PMID: 21988547 PMC: 3876279. DOI: 10.1667/rr2241.1.
Pediatric digital radiography summit overview: state of confusion.
Don S Pediatr Radiol. 2011; 41(5):567-72.
PMID: 21491196 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-010-1905-2.
The ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history.
Burnside E, Sickles E, Bassett L, Rubin D, Lee C, Ikeda D J Am Coll Radiol. 2009; 6(12):851-60.
PMID: 19945040 PMC: 3099247. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.07.023.