» Articles » PMID: 22175854

Surprising Repair Activities of Nonpolar Analogs of 8-oxoG Expose Features of Recognition and Catalysis by Base Excision Repair Glycosylases

Overview
Journal J Am Chem Soc
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2011 Dec 20
PMID 22175854
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Repair glycosylases locate and excise damaged bases from DNA, playing central roles in preservation of the genome and prevention of disease. Two key glycosylases, Fpg and hOGG1, function to remove the mutagenic oxidized base 8-oxoG (OG) from DNA. To investigate the relative contributions of conformational preferences, leaving group ability, enzyme-base hydrogen bonding, and nucleobase shape on damage recognition by these glycosylases, a series of four substituted indole nucleosides, based on the parent OG nonpolar isostere 2Cl-4F-indole, were tested as possible direct substrates of these enzymes in the context of 30 base pair duplexes paired with C. Surprisingly, single-turnover experiments revealed that Fpg-catalyzed base removal activity of two of the nonpolar analogs was superior to the native OG substrate. The hOGG1 glycosylase was also found to catalyze removal of three of the nonpolar analogs, albeit considerably less efficiently than removal of OG. Of note, the analog that was completely resistant to hOGG1-catalyzed excision has a chloro-substituent at the position of NH7 of OG, implicating the importance of recognition of this position in catalysis. Both hOGG1 and Fpg retained high affinity for the duplexes containing the nonpolar isosteres. These studies show that hydrogen bonds between base and enzyme are not needed for efficient damage recognition and repair by Fpg and underscore the importance of facile extrusion from the helix in its damaged base selection. In contrast, damage removal by hOGG1 is sensitive to both hydrogen bonding groups and nucleobase shape. The relative rates of excision of the analogs with the two glycosylases highlight key differences in their mechanisms of damaged base recognition and removal.

Citing Articles

Chemical Tools for the Study of DNA Repair.

Jun Y, Kool E Acc Chem Res. 2022; 55(23):3495-3506.

PMID: 36355579 PMC: 11164294. DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00608.


Recent Advances in Electrochemical Sensing of Hydrogen Peroxide (HO) Released from Cancer Cells.

Ahmad T, Iqbal A, Ahsan Halim S, Uddin J, Khan A, El Deeb S Nanomaterials (Basel). 2022; 12(9).

PMID: 35564184 PMC: 9103167. DOI: 10.3390/nano12091475.


Construction of a self-directed replication system for label-free and real-time sensing of repair glycosylases with zero background.

Wang L, Lu Y, Zhang C Chem Sci. 2020; 11(2):587-595.

PMID: 32206275 PMC: 7069502. DOI: 10.1039/c9sc04738g.


Synthesis of Site-Specific Crown Ether Adducts to DNA Abasic Sites: 8-Oxo-7,8-Dihydro-2'-Deoxyguanosine and 2'-Deoxycytidine.

An N, Fleming A, Rosecrans N, Liao Y, Burrows C Methods Mol Biol. 2019; 1973:15-25.

PMID: 31016693 PMC: 6482849. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9216-4_2.


Targeting Base Excision Repair Glycosylases with DNA Containing Transition State Mimics Prepared via Click Chemistry.

Yuen P, Green S, Ashby J, Lay K, Santra A, Chen X ACS Chem Biol. 2018; 14(1):27-36.

PMID: 30500207 PMC: 6825804. DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.8b00771.


References
1.
Dzantiev L, Alekseyev Y, Morales J, Kool E, Romano L . Significance of nucleobase shape complementarity and hydrogen bonding in the formation and stability of the closed polymerase-DNA complex. Biochemistry. 2001; 40(10):3215-21. DOI: 10.1021/bi002569i. View

2.
Porello S, Leyes A, David S . Single-turnover and pre-steady-state kinetics of the reaction of the adenine glycosylase MutY with mismatch-containing DNA substrates. Biochemistry. 1998; 37(42):14756-64. DOI: 10.1021/bi981594+. View

3.
Kim T, Delaney J, Essigmann J, Kool E . Probing the active site tightness of DNA polymerase in subangstrom increments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(44):15803-8. PMC: 1276059. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0505113102. View

4.
Fromme J, Verdine G . DNA lesion recognition by the bacterial repair enzyme MutM. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278(51):51543-8. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M307768200. View

5.
OBrien P . Catalytic promiscuity and the divergent evolution of DNA repair enzymes. Chem Rev. 2006; 106(2):720-52. DOI: 10.1021/cr040481v. View