» Articles » PMID: 22175655

Measuring Alzheimer Disease Progression with Transition Probabilities: Estimates from NACC-UDS

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2011 Dec 20
PMID 22175655
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Estimate the probabilities, for Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, of transitioning between stages of disease severity (mild, moderate, severe, dead) and care settings (community, institutional).

Methods: Data were compiled by the National Alzheimer Coordinating Center. The main analyses were limited to 3,852 patients who were 50 years old, diagnosed with possible/probable AD and had at least two center visits. A multinomial logistic model accounting for patient and center level correlation was used to calculate transition probabilities between stages of the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). Separately we calculated the probabilities of being institutionalized based on CDR stage. Both analyses controlled for baseline age, time between visits, sex, marital status, whether white, whether Hispanic and number of years of education.

Results: The annual probabilities of dying for patients in mild, moderate and severe health states were 5.5%, 21.5% and 48.0%, respectively, while the annual probabilities for institutionalization were 1.2%, 3.4% and 6.6%, respectively. The majority of mild and moderate patients remain in the same health state after one year, 77.4% and 50.1% respectively. Progressing patients are most likely to transition one stage, but 1.3% of mild patients become severe in one year. Some patients revert to lower severity stages, 7% from moderate to mild.

Conclusions: Transition probabilities to higher CDR stages and to institutionalization are lower than those published previously, but the probability of death is higher. These results are useful for understanding AD progression and can be used in simulation models to evaluate costs and compare new treatments or policies.

Citing Articles

Development and validation of a clinical prediction tool to estimate survival in community-dwelling adults living with dementia: a protocol.

Bonares M, Fisher S, Clarke A, Dover K, Quinn K, Stall N BMJ Open. 2024; 14(11):e086231.

PMID: 39551579 PMC: 11574448. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086231.


Racial/ethnic differences in neuropsychiatric disturbances associated with incident dementia.

Wise E, Yan H, Oh E, Leoutsakos J Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2024; 16(3):e12615.

PMID: 38974877 PMC: 11224973. DOI: 10.1002/dad2.12615.


Is Aducanumab treatment developed to prevent progression of Alzheimer's disease cost-effective in Turkey?.

Yigit V, Kalender S, Cetinturk I Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023; 21(1):51.

PMID: 37559042 PMC: 10410945. DOI: 10.1186/s12962-023-00463-7.


Cost-utility analysis of a multispecialty interprofessional team dementia care model in Ontario, Canada.

Wong W, Lee L, Walker S, Lee C, Patel T, Hillier L BMJ Open. 2023; 13(4):e064882.

PMID: 37076160 PMC: 10124186. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064882.


Using dynamic microsimulation to project cognitive function in the elderly population.

Wei Y, Heun-Johnson H, Tysinger B PLoS One. 2022; 17(9):e0274417.

PMID: 36107946 PMC: 9477290. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274417.


References
1.
Williams M, Roe C, Morris J . Stability of the Clinical Dementia Rating, 1979-2007. Arch Neurol. 2009; 66(6):773-7. PMC: 2779108. DOI: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.69. View

2.
McMahon P, Araki S, Neumann P, Harris G, Gazelle G . Cost-effectiveness of functional imaging tests in the diagnosis of Alzheimer disease. Radiology. 2000; 217(1):58-68. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.217.1.r00se1358. View

3.
Plassman B, Langa K, Fisher G, Heeringa S, Weir D, Ofstedal M . Prevalence of dementia in the United States: the aging, demographics, and memory study. Neuroepidemiology. 2007; 29(1-2):125-32. PMC: 2705925. DOI: 10.1159/000109998. View

4.
Cummings J, Mega M, Gray K, Carusi D, Gornbein J . The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology. 1994; 44(12):2308-14. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.44.12.2308. View

5.
Tombaugh T, McIntyre N . The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992; 40(9):922-35. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb01992.x. View