» Articles » PMID: 22170015

Do the Speeds Defined by the American College of Sports Medicine Metabolic Equation for Running Produce Target Energy Expenditures During Isocaloric Exercise Bouts?

Overview
Specialty Physiology
Date 2011 Dec 16
PMID 22170015
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The accuracy of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) equations for producing predicted values of heart rate reserve (HRR) and oxygen uptake reserve (VO2R) and consequently, target energy expenditure (EE) during exercise are yet to be established. This study investigated whether speeds defined by the ACSM metabolic equation for running correctly estimate the EEs during isocaloric exercise bouts. Twenty-eight men performed a ramp-incremental maximal exercise test to determine HRmax and VO2max. Two continuous exercise bouts at 60 and 80% VO2R and target EE of 400 kcal were then performed. In the 60% VO2R exercise the observed VO2R and EE were lower than predicted only during the first time quartile of the bout (t = 6.5, p < 0.001), whereas at 80% VO2R it was lower during the first (t = 15.3, p < 0.001), second (t = 5.4, p < 0.001) and third (t = 3.1, p = 0.025) quartiles. The observed HR was lower than predicted in the first time quartile of the 60% [Formula: see text] (t = 5.6, p < 0.001) and 80% VO2R bouts (t = 10.7, p < 0.001), whereas no significant differences occurred for any other time quartiles (p ≥ 0.23). In conclusion, the running speed defined by the ACSM metabolic equation overestimated VO2R and EE within exercise performed at 60 and 80% VO2R especially in higher intensities.

Citing Articles

Modulators of Energy Expenditure Accuracy in Adults with Overweight or Obesity: E-MECHANIC Secondary Analyses.

Matthews R, Hochsmann C, Erickson M, Dorling J, Spielmann G, Johannsen N Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2024; 57(3):470-480.

PMID: 39401314 PMC: 11801430. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003583.


Comparison of VOmax Estimations for Maximal and Submaximal Exercise Tests in Apparently Healthy Adults.

Dugas M, Paradis-Deschenes P, Simard L, Chevrette T, Blackburn P, Lavalliere M Sports (Basel). 2023; 11(12).

PMID: 38133102 PMC: 10747607. DOI: 10.3390/sports11120235.


Music Tempo: A Tool for Regulating Walking Cadence and Physical Activity Intensity in Overweight Adults?.

Faulkner M, McNeilly A, Davison G, Rowe D, Hewitt A, Nevill A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(15).

PMID: 34360151 PMC: 8345504. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18157855.


Effects of moderate and high intensity isocaloric aerobic training upon microvascular reactivity and myocardial oxidative stress in rats.

Paes L, Lima D, Matsuura C, de Souza M, Cyrino F, Barbosa C PLoS One. 2020; 15(2):e0218228.

PMID: 32032358 PMC: 7006926. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218228.


Oxygen uptake, respiratory exchange ratio, or total distance: a comparison of methods to equalize exercise volume in Wistar rats.

Paes L, Borges J, Cunha F, Souza M, Cyrino F, Bottino D Braz J Med Biol Res. 2016; 49(8).

PMID: 27487418 PMC: 4974018. DOI: 10.1590/1414-431X20165200.


References
1.
Byrne N, Hills A . Relationships between HR and (.)VO(2) in the obese. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002; 34(9):1419-27. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200209000-00004. View

2.
Gormley S, Swain D, High R, Spina R, Dowling E, Kotipalli U . Effect of intensity of aerobic training on VO2max. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008; 40(7):1336-43. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31816c4839. View

3.
Lounana J, Campion F, Noakes T, Medelli J . Relationship between %HRmax, %HR reserve, %VO2max, and %VO2 reserve in elite cyclists. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007; 39(2):350-7. DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000246996.63976.5f. View

4.
Buchfuhrer M, Hansen J, Robinson T, Sue D, Wasserman K, Whipp B . Optimizing the exercise protocol for cardiopulmonary assessment. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1983; 55(5):1558-64. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1983.55.5.1558. View

5.
Compher C, Frankenfield D, Keim N, Roth-Yousey L . Best practice methods to apply to measurement of resting metabolic rate in adults: a systematic review. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006; 106(6):881-903. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.02.009. View