» Articles » PMID: 22169211

Epileptic Seizures from Abnormal Networks: Why Some Seizures Defy Predictability

Overview
Journal Epilepsy Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2011 Dec 16
PMID 22169211
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Seizure prediction has proven to be difficult in clinically realistic environments. Is it possible that fluctuations in cortical firing could influence the onset of seizures in an ictal zone? To test this, we have now used neural network simulations in a computational model of cortex having a total of 65,536 neurons with intercellular wiring patterned after histological data. A spatially distributed Poisson driven background input representing the activity of neighboring cortex affected 1% of the neurons. Gamma distributions were fit to the interbursting phase intervals, a non-parametric test for randomness was applied, and a dynamical systems analysis was performed to search for period-1 orbits in the intervals. The non-parametric analysis suggests that intervals are being drawn at random from their underlying joint distribution and the dynamical systems analysis is consistent with a nondeterministic dynamical interpretation of the generation of bursting phases. These results imply that in a region of cortex with abnormal connectivity analogous to a seizure focus, it is possible to initiate seizure activity with fluctuations of input from the surrounding cortical regions. These findings suggest one possibility for ictal generation from abnormal focal epileptic networks. This mechanism additionally could help explain the difficulty in predicting partial seizures in some patients.

Citing Articles

Cross-scale effects of neural interactions during human neocortical seizure activity.

Eissa T, Dijkstra K, Brune C, Emerson R, van Putten M, Goodman R Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114(40):10761-10766.

PMID: 28923948 PMC: 5635869. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1702490114.


Impact of Neuronal Membrane Damage on the Local Field Potential in a Large-Scale Simulation of Cerebral Cortex.

Boothe D, Yu A, Kudela P, Anderson W, Vettel J, Franaszczuk P Front Neurol. 2017; 8:236.

PMID: 28638364 PMC: 5461262. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00236.


Interaction between synaptic inhibition and glial-potassium dynamics leads to diverse seizure transition modes in biophysical models of human focal seizures.

Y Ho E, Truccolo W J Comput Neurosci. 2016; 41(2):225-44.

PMID: 27488433 PMC: 5002283. DOI: 10.1007/s10827-016-0615-7.


A Phase-Locked Loop Epilepsy Network Emulator.

Watson P, Horecka K, Cohen N, Ratnam R Neurocomputing (Amst). 2015; 173(Pt 3):1245-1249.

PMID: 26664133 PMC: 4671081. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.08.082.


Classifying normal and abnormal status based on video recordings of epileptic patients.

Li J, Zhen X, Liu X, Ouyang G ScientificWorldJournal. 2014; 2014:459636.

PMID: 24977196 PMC: 4000972. DOI: 10.1155/2014/459636.


References
1.
Osorio I, Frei M, Manly B, Sunderam S, Bhavaraju N, Wilkinson S . An introduction to contingent (closed-loop) brain electrical stimulation for seizure blockage, to ultra-short-term clinical trials, and to multidimensional statistical analysis of therapeutic efficacy. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2002; 18(6):533-44. DOI: 10.1097/00004691-200111000-00003. View

2.
Dudek F, Sutula T . Epileptogenesis in the dentate gyrus: a critical perspective. Prog Brain Res. 2007; 163:755-73. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)63041-6. View

3.
Morgan R, Soltesz I . Nonrandom connectivity of the epileptic dentate gyrus predicts a major role for neuronal hubs in seizures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(16):6179-84. PMC: 2299224. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0801372105. View

4.
Worrell G, Parish L, Cranstoun S, Jonas R, Baltuch G, Litt B . High-frequency oscillations and seizure generation in neocortical epilepsy. Brain. 2004; 127(Pt 7):1496-506. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh149. View

5.
Dyhrfjeld-Johnsen J, Santhakumar V, Morgan R, Huerta R, Tsimring L, Soltesz I . Topological determinants of epileptogenesis in large-scale structural and functional models of the dentate gyrus derived from experimental data. J Neurophysiol. 2006; 97(2):1566-87. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00950.2006. View