» Articles » PMID: 22169079

A Critical Analysis of the Long-term Impact of Radical Prostatectomy on Cancer Control and Function Outcomes

Overview
Journal Eur Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2011 Dec 16
PMID 22169079
Citations 110
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Context: The optimal management strategy for men with newly diagnosed clinically localized prostate cancer remains a matter of debate. Numerous series have reported cancer control and quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes following treatment with radical prostatectomy (RP).

Objective: Critically review published oncologic and functional outcomes after RP, and evaluate factors associated with these outcome measures.

Evidence Acquisition: A review of the literature was performed using the Medline and Web of Sciences databases. Relevant reports published between 1980 and 2011 identified using the keywords prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy, prostate-specific antigen, biochemical recurrence, incontinence, and erectile dysfunction were reviewed and summarized.

Evidence Synthesis: Cancer control rates following RP largely depend on the definition of treatment efficacy. While up to 40% of men have been reported to experience postoperative biochemical recurrence on long-term follow-up, death from prostate cancer has been noted in <10% of men at 15 yr after surgery in contemporary series. For men with high-risk disease, surgery affords pathologic staging, thereby facilitating the selective application of secondary therapies, and has been associated with decreased mortality risk versus radiation in retrospective series. Reported functional outcomes after surgery, particularly urinary continence and erectile dysfunction, have varied greatly to date. These assessments have been limited by nonstandardized reporting methodology. The use of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has increased in recent years, and while follow-up is thus far short, available data do not suggest the superiority of either approach in terms of functional or oncologic outcomes.

Conclusions: RP is associated with excellent long-term cancer control. Continued efforts to conduct prospective assessments of postoperative functional outcomes are necessary using validated QoL instruments. The importance of surgical approach will also require further study, incorporating comparative oncologic, functional, and economic data.

Citing Articles

Uncovering the Role of in Prostate Cancer: Insights from Genetic and Expression Analyses.

Chang C, Bao B, Lu T, Chen L, Chen Y, Lin T J Cancer. 2025; 16(3):932-941.

PMID: 39781359 PMC: 11705053. DOI: 10.7150/jca.104705.


Investigating the prognostic utility of promoter methylation in prostate cancer.

Pidsley R, Lam D, Qu W, Stricker P, Kench J, Horvath L BJUI Compass. 2025; 5(12):1299-1306.

PMID: 39744075 PMC: 11685177. DOI: 10.1002/bco2.445.


Factors Contributing to Early Recovery of Urinary Continence Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Narrative Review.

Barakat B, Hadaschik B, Al-Nader M, Schakaki S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(22).

PMID: 39597923 PMC: 11595165. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13226780.


Oncological Outcomes of Partial Gland Ablation Using High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound After Additional Confirmatory Transperineal Mapping Biopsy in Men with Prostate Cancer.

Lee J, Song W Biomedicines. 2024; 12(11).

PMID: 39595053 PMC: 11592274. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12112487.


Management of Post-RALP SUI and ED - What are and What Should we be Doing?.

Pereira T, Rust J, Bernie H Curr Urol Rep. 2024; 26(1):19.

PMID: 39546126 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-024-01249-x.