» Articles » PMID: 22167660

Improving Propensity for Patient Self-advocacy Through Wellness Recovery Action Planning: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2011 Dec 15
PMID 22167660
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A fundamental aspect of successful illness self-management for people with serious mental illnesses is the ability to advocate for themselves in health and rehabilitation settings. This study reports findings from a randomized controlled trial comparing propensity for patient self-advocacy among those who received a peer-led mental illness self-management intervention called Wellness Recovery Action Planning (WRAP) and those who received usual care. Outcomes were self-reported engagement in self-advocacy with service providers, and the relationship between patient self-advocacy and other key recovery outcomes. In a multivariable analysis, at immediate post-intervention and 6-month follow-up, WRAP participants were significantly more likely than controls to report engaging in self-advocacy with their service providers. Higher self-advocacy also was associated with greater hopefulness, better environmental quality of life, and fewer psychiatric symptoms among the intervention group. These findings provide additional support for the positive impact of peer-led illness self-management on mental health recovery.

Citing Articles

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Patient Self-Advocacy Scale using classical test theory and item response theory.

Cui J, Wang J, Yue A, Cao J, Zhang Z, Shi B Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6871.

PMID: 40011690 PMC: 11865501. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91129-2.


Identifying the heterogeneity of self-advocacy in Chinese patients with breast cancer using latent profile analysis and symptom networks.

Teng L, Dong Y, Yang Y, Zhou Z, Sun J, Wang T Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2025; 12:100648.

PMID: 39896760 PMC: 11783386. DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100648.


Exploring Patient Empowerment in Major Depressive Disorder: Correlations of Trust, Active Role in Shared Decision-Making, and Symptomatology in a Sample of Italian Patients.

Rodolico A, Cutrufelli P, Maccarone G, Avincola G, Concerto C, Cunsolo A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(20).

PMID: 39458231 PMC: 11508731. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13206282.


The 'Paths to everyday life' (PEER) trial - a qualitative study of mechanisms of change from the perspectives of individuals with mental health difficulties participating in peer support groups led by volunteer peers.

Egmose C, Poulsen C, Bjorkedal S, Eplov L BMC Psychiatry. 2024; 24(1):555.

PMID: 39138435 PMC: 11321162. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-05992-w.


Effectiveness of Peer Support Programs for Severe Mental Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Lee S, Yu H Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(12).

PMID: 38921293 PMC: 11203176. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12121179.


References
1.
Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T . Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997; 44(5):681-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00221-3. View

2.
Gluud L . Bias in clinical intervention research. Am J Epidemiol. 2006; 163(6):493-501. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwj069. View

3.
Brashers D, Haas S, Neidig J . The patient self-advocacy scale: measuring patient involvement in health care decision-making interactions. Health Commun. 2005; 11(2):97-121. DOI: 10.1207/s15327027hc1102_1. View

4.
Skevington S, Lotfy M, OConnell K . The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004; 13(2):299-310. DOI: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00. View

5.
Sherbourne C, Stewart A . The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med. 1991; 32(6):705-14. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90150-b. View