» Articles » PMID: 22164149

Visuo-haptic Interactions in Unilateral Spatial Neglect: the Cross Modal Judd Illusion

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2011 Dec 14
PMID 22164149
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unilateral spatial neglect (USN) has been mainly investigated in the visual modality; only few studies compared spatial neglect across different sensory modalities, and explored their multisensory interactions, with controversial results. We investigated the integration between vision and haptics, through a bisection task of a cross modal illusion, the Judd variant of the Müller-Lyer illusion. We examined right-brain-damaged patients with (n = 7) and without (n = 7) left USN, and neurologically unimpaired participants (n = 14) in the bisection of Judd stimuli under visual, haptic, and visuo-haptic presentation. Neglect patients showed the characteristic rightward bias in the bisection of the baseline stimuli in the visual modality, but not in the haptic and visuo-haptic conditions. The illusory effects were preserved in each group and in each modality, indicating that the processing of the cross modal illusion is independent of the presence of deficits of spatial attention and representation. Spatial neglect can be modality-specific, but visual and tactile sensory inputs are properly integrated.

Citing Articles

Low vision aids and age are associated with Müller-Lyer illusion in congenital visually impaired children.

Lin N, Chen B, Yang M, Lu F, Deng R Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1278554.

PMID: 38078226 PMC: 10704360. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1278554.


Validation of "Neurit.Space": Three Digital Tests for the Neuropsychological Evaluation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect.

Massetti G, Albini F, Casati C, Toneatto C, Terruzzi S, Etzi R J Clin Med. 2023; 12(8).

PMID: 37109378 PMC: 10143133. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12083042.


Spatial Neglect Subtypes, Definitions and Assessment Tools: A Scoping Review.

Williams L, Kernot J, Hillier S, Loetscher T Front Neurol. 2021; 12:742365.

PMID: 34899565 PMC: 8653914. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.742365.


Prism Adaptation and Optokinetic Stimulation Comparison in the Rehabilitation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect.

Facchin A, Figliano G, Daini R Brain Sci. 2021; 11(11).

PMID: 34827487 PMC: 8615435. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11111488.


Altered visual feedback from an embodied avatar unconsciously influences movement amplitude and muscle activity.

Bourdin P, Martini M, Sanchez-Vives M Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):19747.

PMID: 31874987 PMC: 6930246. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-56034-5.


References
1.
Jacquin-Courtois S, Rode G, Pavani F, OShea J, Giard M, Boisson D . Effect of prism adaptation on left dichotic listening deficit in neglect patients: glasses to hear better?. Brain. 2010; 133(Pt 3):895-908. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awp327. View

2.
Beschin N, Cazzani M, Cubelli R, Della Sala S, Spinazzola L . Ignoring left and far: an investigation of tactile neglect. Neuropsychologia. 1996; 34(1):41-9. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00063-1. View

3.
Schroder A, Wist E, Homberg V . TENS and optokinetic stimulation in neglect therapy after cerebrovascular accident: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Neurol. 2008; 15(9):922-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02229.x. View

4.
Campbell D, Oxbury J . Recovery from unilateral visuo-spatial neglect?. Cortex. 1976; 12(4):303-12. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(76)80034-2. View

5.
Benton A . Neuropsychological assessment. Annu Rev Psychol. 1994; 45:1-23. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.45.020194.000245. View