» Articles » PMID: 22160184

New Similarity Search Based Glioma Grading

Overview
Journal Neuroradiology
Specialties Neurology
Radiology
Date 2011 Dec 14
PMID 22160184
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: MR-based differentiation between low- and high-grade gliomas is predominately based on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (CE-T1w). However, functional MR sequences as perfusion- and diffusion-weighted sequences can provide additional information on tumor grade. Here, we tested the potential of a recently developed similarity search based method that integrates information of CE-T1w and perfusion maps for non-invasive MR-based glioma grading.

Methods: We prospectively included 37 untreated glioma patients (23 grade I/II, 14 grade III gliomas), in whom 3T MRI with FLAIR, pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted, and perfusion sequences was performed. Cerebral blood volume, cerebral blood flow, and mean transit time maps as well as CE-T1w images were used as input for the similarity search. Data sets were preprocessed and converted to four-dimensional Gaussian Mixture Models that considered correlations between the different MR sequences. For each patient, a so-called tumor feature vector (= probability-based classifier) was defined and used for grading. Biopsy was used as gold standard, and similarity based grading was compared to grading solely based on CE-T1w.

Results: Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of pure CE-T1w based glioma grading were 64.9%, 78.6%, and 56.5%, respectively. Similarity search based tumor grading allowed differentiation between low-grade (I or II) and high-grade (III) gliomas with an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 83.8%, 78.6%, and 87.0%.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that integration of perfusion parameters and CE-T1w information in a semi-automatic similarity search based analysis improves the potential of MR-based glioma grading compared to CE-T1w data alone.

Citing Articles

Glioma Grading and Determination of IDH Mutation Status and ATRX loss by DCE and ASL Perfusion.

Brendle C, Hempel J, Schittenhelm J, Skardelly M, Tabatabai G, Bender B Clin Neuroradiol. 2017; 28(3):421-428.

PMID: 28488024 DOI: 10.1007/s00062-017-0590-z.


Prognostic value of molecular and imaging biomarkers in patients with supratentorial glioma.

Lopci E, Riva M, Olivari L, Raneri F, Soffietti R, Piccardo A Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017; 44(7):1155-1164.

PMID: 28110346 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3618-3.


Advanced MRI may complement histological diagnosis of lower grade gliomas and help in predicting survival.

Cuccarini V, Erbetta A, Farinotti M, Cuppini L, Ghielmetti F, Pollo B J Neurooncol. 2015; 126(2):279-88.

PMID: 26468137 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-015-1960-5.


Comparison of the Effect of Vessel Size Imaging and Cerebral Blood Volume Derived from Perfusion MR Imaging on Glioma Grading.

Kang H, Xiao H, Chen J, Tan Y, Chen X, Xie T AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015; 37(1):51-7.

PMID: 26381565 PMC: 7960212. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4477.


Glioma diagnostics and biomarkers: an ongoing challenge in the field of medicine and science.

Hochberg F, Atai N, Gonda D, Hughes M, Mawejje B, Balaj L Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2014; 14(4):439-52.

PMID: 24746164 PMC: 5451266. DOI: 10.1586/14737159.2014.905202.


References
1.
Bedekar D, Jensen T, Schmainda K . Standardization of relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) image maps for ease of both inter- and intrapatient comparisons. Magn Reson Med. 2010; 64(3):907-13. PMC: 4323176. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22445. View

2.
Rorden C, Karnath H, Bonilha L . Improving lesion-symptom mapping. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007; 19(7):1081-8. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.7.1081. View

3.
Kunz M, Thon N, Eigenbrod S, Hartmann C, Egensperger R, Herms J . Hot spots in dynamic (18)FET-PET delineate malignant tumor parts within suspected WHO grade II gliomas. Neuro Oncol. 2011; 13(3):307-16. PMC: 3064604. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noq196. View

4.
Pokrajac D, Megalooikonomou V, Lazarevic A, Kontos D, Obradovic Z . Applying spatial distribution analysis techniques to classification of 3D medical images. Artif Intell Med. 2005; 33(3):261-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2004.07.001. View

5.
Zacharaki E, Wang S, Chawla S, Yoo D, Wolf R, Melhem E . Classification of brain tumor type and grade using MRI texture and shape in a machine learning scheme. Magn Reson Med. 2009; 62(6):1609-18. PMC: 2863141. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22147. View