» Articles » PMID: 22152835

Postnatal Care: Development of a Psychometric Multidimensional Satisfaction Questionnaire (the WOMBPNSQ) to Assess Women's Views

Overview
Journal Br J Gen Pract
Specialty Public Health
Date 2011 Dec 14
PMID 22152835
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Postnatal care is the neglected area of pregnancy care, despite repeated calls to improve it. Changes would require assessment, which should include women's views. No suitable satisfaction questionnaire exists to enable this.

Aim: To develop a multidimensional psychometric postnatal satisfaction self-completion instrument.

Setting: Ten maternity services in south west England from 2006-2009.

Method: Sources for questions were literature review, fieldwork, and related published instruments. Principal components analysis with varimax rotation was used to develop the final WOMen's views of Birth Postnatal Satisfaction Questionnaire (WOMBPNSQ) version. Validity and internal reliability were assessed. Questionnaires were mailed 6-8 weeks postnatally (with one reminder).

Results: The WOMBPNSQ comprises 36 seven-point Likert questions (13 dimensions including general satisfaction). Of 300 women, 166 (55.3%) replied; of these 155 (95.1 %) were white, 152 (93.8%) were married or cohabiting, 135 (81.3%) gave birth in a consultant unit, 129 (78.6%) had a vaginal delivery; and 100 (60.6%) were multiparous. The 12 specific dimensions were: support from professionals or partner, or social support; care from GP and health visitor; advice on contraception, feeding baby, the mother's health; continuity of care; duration of inpatient stay; home visiting; pain after birth. These have internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha varying from 0.624 to 0.902). Various demographic and clinical characteristics were significantly associated with specific dimensions.

Conclusion: WOMBPNSQ could be used to assess existing or planned changes to maternity services or as a screening instrument, which would then enable in-depth qualitative assessment of areas of dissatisfaction. Its convergent validity and test-retest reliability are still to be assessed but are an improvement upon existing postnatal satisfaction questionnaires.

Citing Articles

Content validity of patient-reported measures evaluating experiences of the quality of transitions in healthcare settings-a scoping review.

Walloe S, Roikjaer S, Hansen S, Zangger G, Mortensen S, Korfitsen C BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):828.

PMID: 39039533 PMC: 11265152. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11298-0.


Development and psychometric testing of a Chinese version of the postnatal care experience scale for postpartum women.

Sun L, Wang X, Gao H, Li Z, Chen M, Qian X BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1):868.

PMID: 38104121 PMC: 10724998. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-06187-z.


Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: A scoping review.

Galle A, Moran A, Bonet M, Graham K, Muzigaba M, Portela A PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023; 3(2):e0001384.

PMID: 36963034 PMC: 10021656. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001384.


Comparison of labour and postnatal satisfaction between women with and without severe maternal morbidity: a double-cohort study.

Fatin Imtithal A, Norhayati M, Nor Akma Y BMJ Open. 2022; 12(4):e049757.

PMID: 35418419 PMC: 9014019. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049757.


Psychometric properties of the Malay version Women's Views of Birth Postnatal Satisfaction Questionnaire using the Rasch measurement model: a cross-sectional study.

Norhayati M, Fatin Imtithal A, Nor Akma Y BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021; 21(1):711.

PMID: 34686139 PMC: 8532326. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04184-8.


References
1.
Rijnders M, Baston H, Schonbeck Y, van der Pal K, Prins M, Green J . Perinatal factors related to negative or positive recall of birth experience in women 3 years postpartum in the Netherlands. Birth. 2008; 35(2):107-16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00223.x. View

2.
Dalby D, Williams J, Hodnett E, Rush J . Postpartum safety and satisfaction following early discharge. Can J Public Health. 1996; 87(2):90-4. View

3.
Lewis J . Patient views on quality care in general practice: literature review. Soc Sci Med. 1994; 39(5):655-70. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90022-1. View

4.
Hall J, Dornan M . What patients like about their medical care and how often they are asked: a meta-analysis of the satisfaction literature. Soc Sci Med. 1988; 27(9):935-9. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90284-5. View

5.
Gamble J, Creedy D, Teakle B . Women's expectations of maternity services: a community-based survey. Women Birth. 2007; 20(3):115-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2007.05.003. View