Clinical Evaluation of Giomer- and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Class V Noncarious Cervical Lesions: An in Vivo Study

Overview

Journal J Conserv Dent

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2011 Dec 7

PMID 22144814

Citations 19

Authors

Kn Jyothi

S Annapurna

Anil S Kumar

P Venugopal

Cm Jayashankara

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the clinical performance of Giomer (Beautifil II) and RMGIC (Fuji II LC) in noncarious cervical lesions.

Materials And Methods: Thirty-two subjects with one or two pairs of noncarious cervical lesions were included in the study. Each pair of lesion was restored with either giomer or RMGIC assigned randomly. Clinical evaluation of restorations was done using USPHS criteria. Data was formulated in a predesigned format and subjected to statistical analysis using the chi square test.

Results: Statistically significant difference was found between RMGIC and Giomer with respect to surface roughness with P value <0.001.

Conclusion: Giomer showed superior surface finish compared to RMGIC. Both Giomer and RMGIC showed equal retention ability.

Citing Articles

Clinical evaluation of giomer-based injectable resin composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer in class V carious lesions over 18 months: A randomized clinical trial.

Hendam R, Mosallam R, Kamal D J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025; 28(1):50-56.

PMID: 39974686 PMC: 11835346. DOI: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_722_24.

Three-year clinical performance of direct restorations using low-shrinkage Giomer vs. nano-hybrid resin composite.

Toz-Akalin T, Ozturk-Bozkurt F, Kusdemir M, Ozsoy A, Yuzbasioglu E, Ozcan M Front Dent Med. 2025; 5:1459473.

PMID: 39917677 PMC: 11797754. DOI: 10.3389/fdmed.2024.1459473.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Carious Primary Molar Restorations.

Bhavana K, Uloopi K, Vinay C, Chaitanya P, Ramesh M, Ahalya P Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024; 17(10):1109-1113.

PMID: 39650299 PMC: 11617437. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2963.

Comparative Evaluation of Two Esthetic Full Coronal Restorative Materials for Primary Incisors.

Dhaker K, Tandon S, Rathore A, Mathur R, Rai T, Sharma S Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024; 17(3):321-327.

PMID: 39144508 PMC: 11320800. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2787.

Do bioactive materials show greater retention rates in restoring permanent teeth than non-bioactive materials? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Fernandes J, Contreras S, da Silva Spinola M, Batista G, Bresciani E, Caneppele T Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 28(1):44.

PMID: 38153565 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05414-3.

References

Yap A, Mok B . Surface finish of a new hybrid aesthetic restorative material. Oper Dent. 2002; 27(2):161-6. View

Maneenut C, Tyas M . Clinical evaluation of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative cements in cervical 'abrasion' lesions: one-year results. Quintessence Int. 1995; 26(10):739-43. View

Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann K, Hinkel R . Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study. Oper Dent. 2001; 25(4):251-8. View

. Non-carious cervical lesions. Recommendations for clinical practice. Oper Dent. 2003; 28(2):109-13. View

Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G . Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions. Quintessence Int. 2000; 30(9):607-14. View

Tyas M . The Class V lesion--aetiology and restoration. Aust Dent J. 1995; 40(3):167-70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1995.tb05631.x. View

Brackett W, Browning W, Ross J, Brackett M . Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material. Oper Dent. 2001; 26(1):12-6. View

Yap A, Yap S, Teo C, Ng J . Comparison of surface finish of new aesthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2004; 29(1):100-4. View

Wilson N, Gordan V, Brunton P, Wilson M, Crisp R, Mjor I . Two-centre evaluation of a resin composite/ self-etching restorative system: three-year findings. J Adhes Dent. 2006; 8(1):47-51. View

10.

Matis B, Cochran M, Carlson T, Guba C, Eckert G . A three-year clinical evaluation of two dentin bonding agents. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004; 135(4):451-7. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0209. View

11.

Gordan V, Mjor I . Short- and long-term clinical evaluation of post-operative sensitivity of a new resin-based restorative material and self-etching primer. Oper Dent. 2002; 27(6):543-8. View

12.

Neo J, Chew C . Direct tooth-colored materials for noncarious lesions: a 3-year clinical report. Quintessence Int. 1996; 27(3):183-8. View

13.

Neo J, Chew C, Yap A, Sidhu S . Clinical evaluation of tooth-colored materials in cervical lesions. Am J Dent. 1996; 9(1):15-8. View

14.

Sunico M, Shinkai K, Katoh Y . Two-year clinical performance of occlusal and cervical giomer restorations. Oper Dent. 2005; 30(3):282-9. View

15.

Gordan V, Mondragon E, Watson R, Garvan C, Mjor I . A clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and a giomer restorative material: results at eight years. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007; 138(5):621-7. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0233. View

16.

Brackett W, Dib A, Brackett M, Reyes A, Estrada B . Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2003; 28(5):477-81. View

17.

Cefaly D, Seabra B, Tapety C, Taga E, Valera F, Navarro M . Effectiveness of surface protection of resin modified glass ionomer cements evaluated spectrophotometrically. Oper Dent. 2001; 26(4):401-5. View

18.

Mohamed-Tahir M, Yap A . Effects of pH on the surface texture of glass ionomer based/containing restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2004; 29(5):586-91. View

19.

Attin T, Vataschki M, Hellwig E . Properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Quintessence Int. 1996; 27(3):203-9. View

20.

Heymann H, Sturdevant J, Bayne S, Wilder A, Sluder T, Brunson W . Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations: a two-year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc. 1991; 122(5):41-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8177(91)25015-1. View