» Articles » PMID: 22142449

Risk Factors for Perforation and Delayed Bleeding Associated with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Neoplasms: Analysis of 1123 Lesions

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2011 Dec 7
PMID 22142449
Citations 90
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aim: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a useful procedure for the treatment of early gastric neoplasms; however, this advanced technique has also resulted in an increase in serious complications such as perforation and delayed bleeding. This study aimed to elucidate the risk factors for these complications.

Methods: A total of 1123 lesions diagnosed with early gastric neoplasms and treated by ESD at three institutions were investigated. Retrospectively, patients with or without these complications were compared on the basis of the patient characteristics and treatment results.

Results: Perforation occurred in 27 lesions (2.4%) and delayed bleeding in 56 lesions (5.0%). Multivariate analysis indicated that lesions located in the upper area of the stomach (odds ratio [OR]: 4.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.21-10.75) was associated with a significantly higher risk of perforation, and that age ≥ 80 years (OR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.18-3.90) and a long procedure time (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.001-1.007) were associated with a significantly higher risk of delayed bleeding after ESD. The en bloc resection rate (74% vs 94%) and curative resection rate (48% vs 85%) of lesions with perforation were significantly lower than those without perforation. The rate of residual disease or recurrence after ESD was significantly higher in lesions with delayed bleeding than that without delayed bleeding (5.4% vs 0.84%).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated risk factors for perforation and delayed bleeding associated with ESD. Furthermore, it was clarified that perforation and delayed bleeding influenced post-procedure results and prognosis after ESD.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of alternate mucosa-submucosa clip closure in preventing postoperative adverse events for patients with gastric mucosal lesions after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicenter retrospective study.

Chen L, Jiang J, Li H, Yin X, Tang X, Zhu Y Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025; 18:17562848251317145.

PMID: 39906417 PMC: 11792031. DOI: 10.1177/17562848251317145.


A risk prediction model for delayed bleeding after ESD for gastric precancerous lesions.

Zhu Y, Ji M, Yuan L, Yuan J, Shen L Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(7):3967-3975.

PMID: 38844732 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10923-7.


The Model Study of Phase-Transitional Magnetic-Driven Micromotors for Sealing Gastric Perforation via Mg-Based Micropower Traction.

Xiong K, Xu L Nanomaterials (Basel). 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 38786822 PMC: 11123717. DOI: 10.3390/nano14100865.


A Prospective Observational Study on Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection under Continuous Administration of Antithrombotic Agents.

Kawai D, Iwamuro M, Takenaka R, Obata T, Yamamoto T, Hirata S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 38610651 PMC: 11012390. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13071886.


Chinese national clinical practice guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of early gastric cancer.

Li P, Li Z, Linghu E, Ji J Chin Med J (Engl). 2024; 137(8):887-908.

PMID: 38515297 PMC: 11046028. DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003101.