» Articles » PMID: 22140198

Need for Speed: Better Movement Quality During Faster Task Performance After Stroke

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2011 Dec 6
PMID 22140198
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: . Although slow and insufficient muscle activation is a hallmark of hemiparesis poststroke, movement speed is rarely emphasized during upper-extremity rehabilitation. Moving faster may increase the intensity of task-specific training, but positive and/or negative effects on paretic-limb movement quality are unknown.

Objective: . To determine whether moving quickly instead of at a preferred speed either enhances or impairs paretic-limb task performance after stroke.

Methods: . A total of 16 people with poststroke hemiparesis and 11 healthy controls performed reach-grasp-lift movements at their preferred speed and as fast as possible, using palmar and 3-finger grip types. The authors measured durations of the reach and grasp phases, straightness of the reach path, thumb-index finger separation (aperture), efficiency of finger movement, and grip force.

Results: . Reach and grasp phase durations decreased in the fast condition in both groups, showing that participants were able to move more quickly when asked. When moving fast, the hemiparetic group had reach durations equal to those of healthy controls moving at their preferred speed. Movement quality also improved. Reach paths were straighter, and peak apertures were greater in both groups in the fast condition. The group with hemiparesis also showed improved efficiency of finger movement. Differences in peak grip force across speed conditions did not reach significance.

Conclusions: . People with hemiparesis who can perform reach-grasp-lift movements with a 3-finger grip can move faster than they choose to, and when they do, movement quality improves. Simple instructions to move faster could be a cost-free and effective means of increasing rehabilitation intensity after stroke.

Citing Articles

Is the Assessment of the Non-Paretic Lower Limb in Patients After Stroke Important When Planning Rehabilitation?.

Warenczak-Pawlicka A, Lisinski P Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(4).

PMID: 40006310 PMC: 11858923. DOI: 10.3390/s25041082.


The Effects of Action Observation Speed on Motor Function in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: From Observation to Execution.

Grande-Alonso M, Estradera-Bel M, Forner-Alvarez C, Cuenca-Martinez F, Vidal-Quevedo C, Paris-Alemany A Brain Sci. 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39851399 PMC: 11764160. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci15010031.


Specifications and functional impact of a self-triggered grasp neuroprosthesis developed to restore prehension in hemiparetic post-stroke subjects.

Le Guillou R, Froger J, Morin M, Couderc M, Cormier C, Azevedo-Coste C Biomed Eng Online. 2024; 23(1):129.

PMID: 39709421 PMC: 11662519. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-024-01323-y.


Real-Time Sensing of Upper Extremity Movement Diversity Using Kurtosis Implemented on a Smartwatch.

Cornella-Barba G, Okita S, Li Z, Reinkensmeyer D Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(16).

PMID: 39204961 PMC: 11358890. DOI: 10.3390/s24165266.


Movement Diversity and Complexity Increase as Arm Impairment Decreases After Stroke: Quality of Movement Experience as a Possible Target for Wearable Feedback.

Okita S, Schwerz de Lucena D, Reinkensmeyer D IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2024; 32:2961-2970.

PMID: 39110555 PMC: 11500827. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3439669.


References
1.
Frontera W, GRIMBY L, Larsson L . Firing rate of the lower motoneuron and contractile properties of its muscle fibers after upper motoneuron lesion in man. Muscle Nerve. 1997; 20(8):938-47. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199708)20:8<938::aid-mus2>3.0.co;2-7. View

2.
Nudo R, Milliken G, Jenkins W, Merzenich M . Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci. 1996; 16(2):785-807. PMC: 6578638. View

3.
Lai S, Studenski S, Duncan P, Perera S . Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke. 2002; 33(7):1840-4. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.0000019289.15440.f2. View

4.
Nowak D, Grefkes C, Ameli M, Fink G . Interhemispheric competition after stroke: brain stimulation to enhance recovery of function of the affected hand. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23(7):641-56. DOI: 10.1177/1545968309336661. View

5.
SCHMIDT R, TOEWS J . Grip strength as measured by the Jamar dynamometer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1970; 51(6):321-7. View