» Articles » PMID: 22136987

Positive Surgical Margins After Nephron-sparing Surgery

Overview
Journal Eur Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2011 Dec 6
PMID 22136987
Citations 68
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Context: Little is known on the natural history of positive surgical margins (PSMs) in partial nephrectomy (PN). Accumulating data suggest that secondary nephrectomy might not be necessary in all patients with PSMs after PN.

Objective: Provide an overview on incidence and risk factors for PSMs after partial nephrectomy and on the rate of local and distant disease recurrence related to PSMs. We also provide recommendations on how to avoid and how to treat PSMs after PN.

Evidence Acquisition: A nonsystematic literature research was based on Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science queries on these keywords: nephron-sparing surgery, partial nephrectomy/ies, and margin. Only human studies (original research) published in English were included.

Evidence Synthesis: PSMs are present in 0-7% of patients after open PN, in 0.7-4% after laparoscopic PN, and in 3.9-5.7% after robot-assisted PN. The thickness of healthy parenchyma surrounding the tumour is irrelevant as long as complete tumour removal is achieved. The coincidence of a highly malignant tumour and PSM increases the risk of local recurrence. Intermediate follow-up data indicate that the vast majority of patients with PSMs will not experience local or distant tumour recurrence. Frozen-section analysis for evaluation of resection margins during PN is of minor clinical significance, as the surgeon's gross assessment of macroscopically negative margins provides reliable results.

Conclusions: PSMs in PN are rare. As indicated by intermediate follow-up data, the majority of patients with PSMs after PN remain without disease recurrence, and a surveillance strategy seems preferable to surgical reintervention.

Citing Articles

Tracing the evolving dynamics and research hotspots in the kidney neoplasm and nephron sparing surgery field from the past to the new era.

Yao Y, Liu Y, Yang T, Lu B, Yang X, Zhang H Cancer Med. 2024; 13(12):e7336.

PMID: 39651783 PMC: 11192648. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7336.


Impacts of completely endophytic renal masses on perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gu H, Lv J, Liu Y, Wang H Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1444477.

PMID: 39512766 PMC: 11543353. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1444477.


Comment on: "Open versus robot‑assisted partial nephrectomy for highly complex renal masses: a meta‑analysis of perioperative and functional outcomes".

Fan X, Li K, Yang L J Robot Surg. 2024; 18(1):376.

PMID: 39443399 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02137-9.


Comparison of outcomes of radical and partial nephrectomy for sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma: analysis of the national cancer database.

Wang L, Yuen K, Saitta C, Meagher M, Liu F, Guer M World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):508.

PMID: 39240329 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05169-w.


Comparison of Outcomes Between Partial and Radical Laparoscopic Nephrectomy for Localized Renal Tumors Larger Than Four Centimeters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Dong B, Song J, Yang W, Zhan H, Luan T, Wang J World J Oncol. 2024; 15(4):625-639.

PMID: 38993256 PMC: 11236382. DOI: 10.14740/wjon1866.