» Articles » PMID: 22136530

Transmissibility and Temporal Changes of 2009 PH1N1 Pandemic During Summer and Fall/winter Waves

Overview
Journal BMC Infect Dis
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2011 Dec 6
PMID 22136530
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In order to compare the transmissibility of the 2009 pH1N1 pandemic during successive waves of infections in summer and fall/winter in the Northern Hemisphere, and to assess the temporal changes during the course of the outbreak in relation to the intervention measures implemented, we analyze the epidemiological patterns of the epidemic in Taiwan during July 2009-March 2010.

Methods: We utilize the multi-phase Richards model to fit the weekly cumulative pH1N1 epidemiological data (numbers of confirmed cases and hospitalizations) as well as the daily number of classes suspended under a unique "325" partial school closing policy in Taiwan, in order to pinpoint the turning points of the summer and fall/winter waves, and to estimate the reproduction numbers R for each wave.

Results: Our analysis indicates that the summer wave had slowed down by early September when schools reopened for fall. However, a second fall/winter wave began in late September, approximately 4 weeks after the school reopened, peaking at about 2-3 weeks after the start of the mass immunization campaign in November. R is estimated to be in the range of 1.04-1.27 for the first wave, and between 1.01-1.05 for the second wave.

Conclusions: Transmissibility of the summer wave in Taiwan during July-early September, as measured by R, was lower than that of the earlier spring outbreak in North America and Europe, as well as that of the winter outbreak in Southern Hemisphere. Furthermore, transmissibility during fall/winter in Taiwan was noticeably lower than that of the summer, which is attributable to population-level immunity acquired from the earlier summer wave and also to the intervention measures that were implemented prior to and during the fall/winter wave.

Citing Articles

Student and educator perspectives on virtual institutional introductory pharmacy practice experience (IPPE).

Almohammed O, Alotaibi L, Ibn Malik S BMC Med Educ. 2021; 21(1):257.

PMID: 33947366 PMC: 8093586. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02698-5.


Estimation of the serial interval and basic reproduction number of COVID-19 in Qom, Iran, and three other countries: A data-driven analysis in the early phase of the outbreak.

Aghaali M, Kolifarhood G, Nikbakht R, Saadati H, Hashemi Nazari S Transbound Emerg Dis. 2020; 67(6):2860-2868.

PMID: 32473049 PMC: 7300937. DOI: 10.1111/tbed.13656.


Comparison of methods to Estimate Basic Reproduction Number ( ) of influenza, Using Canada 2009 and 2017-18 A (H1N1) Data.

Nikbakht R, Baneshi M, Bahrampour A, Hosseinnataj A J Res Med Sci. 2019; 24:67.

PMID: 31523253 PMC: 6670001. DOI: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_888_18.


On Temporal Patterns and Circulation of Influenza Virus Strains in Taiwan, 2008-2014: Implications of 2009 pH1N1 Pandemic.

Hsieh Y, Huang H, Lan Y PLoS One. 2016; 11(5):e0154695.

PMID: 27139905 PMC: 4854472. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154695.


Differential Immune Profiles in Two Pandemic Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 Virus Waves at Pandemic Epicenter.

Arriaga-Pizano L, Ferat-Osorio E, Rodriguez-Abrego G, Mancilla-Herrera I, Dominguez-Cerezo E, Valero-Pacheco N Arch Med Res. 2015; 46(8):651-8.

PMID: 26696552 PMC: 4914610. DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2015.12.003.


References
1.
Wallinga J, Lipsitch M . How generation intervals shape the relationship between growth rates and reproductive numbers. Proc Biol Sci. 2007; 274(1609):599-604. PMC: 1766383. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3754. View

2.
Echevarria-Zuno S, Mejia-Arangure J, Mar-Obeso A, Grajales-Muniz C, Robles-Perez E, Gonzalez-Leon M . Infection and death from influenza A H1N1 virus in Mexico: a retrospective analysis. Lancet. 2009; 374(9707):2072-2079. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61638-X. View

3.
Hsieh Y, Ma S . Intervention measures, turning point, and reproduction number for dengue, Singapore, 2005. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009; 80(1):66-71. View

4.
White L, Wallinga J, Finelli L, Reed C, Riley S, Lipsitch M . Estimation of the reproductive number and the serial interval in early phase of the 2009 influenza A/H1N1 pandemic in the USA. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2009; 3(6):267-76. PMC: 2782458. DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2009.00106.x. View

5.
Nishiura H, Castillo-Chavez C, Safan M, Chowell G . Transmission potential of the new influenza A(H1N1) virus and its age-specificity in Japan. Euro Surveill. 2009; 14(22). DOI: 10.2807/ese.14.22.19227-en. View