Introduction:
Miniscrews can be used to provide absolute anchorage during orthodontic treatment. If we could obtain the optimum design or shape of the miniscrew, we might be able to reduce its size and lessen the chance of root contact. In addition, miniscrews are placed at several angles, and orthodontic forces are applied in various directions for clinical requirements. In this study, we used finite element analysis to investigate changes in stress distribution at the supporting bone and miniscrew by changing the angle and the shape of the miniscrew and the direction of force.
Methods:
Three types of miniscrews (cylindrical pin, helical thread, and nonhelical thread) were designed and placed in 2 types of supporting bone (cancellous and cortical). The miniscrews were inclined at 30°, 40°, 45°, 50°, 60°, 70°, 80°, and 90° to the surface of the supporting bone. A force of 2N was applied in 3 directions.
Results:
Significantly lower maximum stress was observed in the cancellous bone compared with the cortical bone. By changing the implantation angle, the ranges of the maximum stress distribution at the supporting bone were 9.46 to 14.8 MPa in the pin type, and 17.8 to 75.2 MPa in the helical thread type. On the other hand, the ranges of the maximum stress distribution at the titanium element were 26.8 to 92.8 MPa in the pin type, and 121 to 382 MPa in the helical thread type. According to the migration length of the threads in the nonhelical type, the maximum stresses were 19.9 to 113 MPa at the bone, and 151 to 313 MPa at the titanium element. By changing the angle of rotation in the helical thread type, the maximum stress distributions were 25.4 to 125 MPa at the bone, and 149 to 426 MPa at the titanium element. Furthermore, the maximum stress varied at each angle according to the direction of the applied load.
Conclusions:
From our results, the maximum stresses observed in all analyzed types and shapes of miniscrews were under the yield stress of pure titanium and cortical bone. This indicates that the miniscrews in this study have enough strength to resist most orthodontic loads.
Citing Articles
[Study on quantitative analysis of bracket-induced nonlinear response of labio-cheek soft tissue during the orthodontic process].
Hua J, Ji L, Dai Q, Liang Z, Guo L, Chen T
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2023; 40(2):295-302.
PMID: 37139761
PMC: 10162933.
DOI: 10.7507/1001-5515.202210016.
Peri-implant bone resorption risk of anterior maxilla narrow single implants: a finite-element analysis.
Gialain I, Silva L, Kasumi Gantier Takano M, Yague Ballester R, Roscoe M, Meira J
Biomater Investig Dent. 2022; 9(1):92-100.
PMID: 36325029
PMC: 9621276.
DOI: 10.1080/26415275.2022.2135516.
A 3-dimensional finite element analysis to evaluate the impact of force direction, insertion angle, and cortical bone thickness on mini-screw and its surrounding bone.
Auwer O, Shamaa M, Hammad S
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2022; 15(4):262-268.
PMID: 35070180
PMC: 8760373.
DOI: 10.34172/joddd.2021.043.
Effect of Different Head Hole Position on the Rotational Resistance and Stability of Orthodontic Miniscrews: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study.
Choi J, Kim M, Kim S, Chung K, Nelson G
Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(11).
PMID: 34070904
PMC: 8198358.
DOI: 10.3390/s21113798.
Effect of Different Surface Designs on the Rotational Resistance and Stability of Orthodontic Miniscrews: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study.
Choi J, Cho J, Oh S, Kim S, Chung K, Nelson G
Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(6).
PMID: 33799632
PMC: 8001794.
DOI: 10.3390/s21061964.
A Custom-Made Orthodontic Mini-Implant-Effect of Insertion Angle and Cortical Bone Thickness on Stress Distribution with a Complex In Vitro and In Vivo Biosafety Profile.
Popa A, Dehelean C, Calniceanu H, Watz C, Brad S, Sinescu C
Materials (Basel). 2020; 13(21).
PMID: 33120951
PMC: 7663474.
DOI: 10.3390/ma13214789.
Investigation of the optimal design of orthodontic mini-implants based on the primary stability: A finite element analysis.
Sadr Haghighi A, Pouyafar V, Navid A, Eskandarinezhad M, Abdollahzadeh Baghaei T
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2019; 13(2):85-89.
PMID: 31592304
PMC: 6773917.
DOI: 10.15171/joddd.2019.013.
Finite element analysis of stresses on adjacent teeth during the traction of palatally impacted canines.
Zeno K, El-Mohtar S, Mustapha S, Ghafari J
Angle Orthod. 2018; 89(3):418-425.
PMID: 30516417
PMC: 8117686.
DOI: 10.2319/061118-437.1.
Stress and displacement pattern evaluation using two different palatal expanders in unilateral cleft lip and palate: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Mathew A, Nagachandran K, Vijayalakshmi D
Prog Orthod. 2016; 17(1):38.
PMID: 27800592
PMC: 5116441.
DOI: 10.1186/s40510-016-0150-0.
Stress distributions of a bracket type orthodontic miniscrew and the surrounding bone under moment loadings: Three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ajami S, Mina A, Nabavizadeh S
J Orthod Sci. 2016; 5(2):64-9.
PMID: 27127753
PMC: 4830140.
DOI: 10.4103/2278-0203.179416.
The Effects of Different Miniscrew Thread Designs and Force Directions on Stress Distribution by 3-dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Fattahi H, Ajami S, Nabavizadeh Rafsanjani A
J Dent (Shiraz). 2015; 16(4):341-8.
PMID: 26636123
PMC: 4664032.
Maximum principal strain as a criterion for prediction of orthodontic mini-implants failure in subject-specific finite element models.
Albogha M, Kitahara T, Todo M, Hyakutake H, Takahashi I
Angle Orthod. 2015; 86(1):24-31.
PMID: 25830709
PMC: 8603949.
DOI: 10.2319/120514-875.1.
Orthodontic bracket debonding: risk of enamel fracture.
Holberg C, Winterhalder P, Holberg N, Wichelhaus A, Rudzki-Janson I
Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 18(1):327-34.
PMID: 23504206
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-013-0969-4.
Effects of placement angle and direction of orthopedic force application on the stability of orthodontic miniscrews.
Lee J, Kim J, Choi Y, Kim K, Chung C
Angle Orthod. 2012; 83(4):667-73.
PMID: 23241005
PMC: 8754024.
DOI: 10.2319/090112-703.1.
Direct versus indirect loading of orthodontic miniscrew implants-an FEM analysis.
Holberg C, Winterhalder P, Holberg N, Rudzki-Janson I, Wichelhaus A
Clin Oral Investig. 2012; 17(8):1821-7.
PMID: 23111639
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0872-4.