» Articles » PMID: 22133254

Comparison of 3 Different Methods to Analyze Ankle Plantarflexor Stiffness in Children with Spastic Diplegia Cerebral Palsy

Overview
Date 2011 Dec 3
PMID 22133254
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare 3 different methods of measuring plantarflexor stiffness in children with spastic diplegia cerebral palsy (CP) and children without disability.

Design: Case-control study.

Setting: Human performance laboratory.

Participants: A retrospective analysis was conducted with children with spastic diplegia (n=121; mean age, 8.4y) and children with typical development (TD) (n=48; mean age, 9.7y).

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures: An isokinetic dynamometer was used to measure ankle plantarflexor stiffness at 10°/s using 3 methods: (1) end-range method, which applied a linear slope to the end of the torque-angle curve; (2) set-range method, which applied a linear slope from 30° to 10° plantarflexion; and (3) a linear method, which applied a slope only to the linear portion of the curve.

Results: Two-way analysis of variance revealed significant main effects for group and stiffness method. The end-range method showed no significant difference between groups for plantarflexor stiffness (P=.62), the set-range method showed the CP group with 120% greater stiffness than the TD group (P<.046), and the linear method showed the CP group with 35% greater stiffness than the TD group (P<.001).

Conclusions: The linear method appeared to resolve the issues with the previous methods; applying a linear slope to a nonlinear curve or applying a linear slope to the same range of motion for each child regardless of their range limitations. It is clear that children with CP have limited range of motion; therefore, stiffness occurs earlier in the range than would be expected for a typically developing child. Using the linear method, children with CP were 35% stiffer in the ankle plantarflexors than typically developing peers.

Citing Articles

What causes increased passive stiffness of plantarflexor muscle-tendon unit in children with spastic cerebral palsy?.

Boulard C, Gross R, Gautheron V, Lapole T Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019; 119(10):2151-2165.

PMID: 31468174 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-019-04208-4.


Forearm Flexor Muscles in Children with Cerebral Palsy Are Weak, Thin and Stiff.

von Walden F, Jalaleddini K, Evertsson B, Friberg J, Valero-Cuevas F, Ponten E Front Comput Neurosci. 2017; 11:30.

PMID: 28487645 PMC: 5403928. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2017.00030.


Clinical application of a robotic ankle training program for cerebral palsy compared to the research laboratory application: does it translate to practice?.

Sukal-Moulton T, Clancy T, Zhang L, Gaebler-Spira D Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95(8):1433-40.

PMID: 24792141 PMC: 4112152. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.04.010.

References
1.
Ross S, Engsberg J . Relation between spasticity and strength in individuals with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002; 44(3):148-57. DOI: 10.1017/s0012162201001852. View

2.
Damiano D, Quinlivan J, Owen B, Shaffrey M, Abel M . Spasticity versus strength in cerebral palsy: relationships among involuntary resistance, voluntary torque, and motor function. Eur J Neurol. 2002; 8 Suppl 5:40-9. DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2001.00037.x. View

3.
Mirbagheri M, Alibiglou L, Thajchayapong M, Rymer W . Muscle and reflex changes with varying joint angle in hemiparetic stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2008; 5:6. PMC: 2292203. DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-5-6. View

4.
Olsson M, Kruger M, Meyer L, Ahnlund L, Gransberg L, Linke W . Fibre type-specific increase in passive muscle tension in spinal cord-injured subjects with spasticity. J Physiol. 2006; 577(Pt 1):339-52. PMC: 2000690. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.116749. View

5.
Sinkjaer T, Magnussen I . Passive, intrinsic and reflex-mediated stiffness in the ankle extensors of hemiparetic patients. Brain. 1994; 117 ( Pt 2):355-63. DOI: 10.1093/brain/117.2.355. View