» Articles » PMID: 22129933

Health Professional Networks As a Vector for Improving Healthcare Quality and Safety: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal BMJ Qual Saf
Specialty Health Services
Date 2011 Dec 2
PMID 22129933
Citations 100
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: While there is a considerable corpus of theoretical and empirical literature on networks within and outside of the health sector, multiple research questions are yet to be answered.

Objective: To conduct a systematic review of studies of professionals' network structures, identifying factors associated with network effectiveness and sustainability, particularly in relation to quality of care and patient safety.

Methods: The authors searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science and Business Source Premier from January 1995 to December 2009.

Results: A majority of the 26 unique studies identified used social network analysis to examine structural relationships in networks: structural relationships within and between networks, health professionals and their social context, health collaboratives and partnerships, and knowledge sharing networks. Key aspects of networks explored were administrative and clinical exchanges, network performance, integration, stability and influences on the quality of healthcare. More recent studies show that cohesive and collaborative health professional networks can facilitate the coordination of care and contribute to improving quality and safety of care. Structural network vulnerabilities include cliques, professional and gender homophily, and over-reliance on central agencies or individuals.

Conclusions: Effective professional networks employ natural structural network features (eg, bridges, brokers, density, centrality, degrees of separation, social capital, trust) in producing collaboratively oriented healthcare. This requires efficient transmission of information and social and professional interaction within and across networks. For those using networks to improve care, recurring success factors are understanding your network's characteristics, attending to its functioning and investing time in facilitating its improvement. Despite this, there is no guarantee that time spent on networks will necessarily improve patient care.

Citing Articles

Beyond the business-to-client model: how the business-to-business model can transform the complex patient care.

Vocanec D, Dzakula A Croat Med J. 2024; 65(4):400-402.

PMID: 39219205 PMC: 11399726.


Assessing the success of a research leadership programme for senior nurses and midwives: A mixed methods programme evaluation.

Menzies J, Ford R, Henshall C Nurs Open. 2024; 11(7):e2176.

PMID: 39021289 PMC: 11255376. DOI: 10.1002/nop2.2176.


Network development in workplace health promotion - empirically based insights from a cross-company network promoting physical activity in Germany.

Gernert M, Fohr G, Schaller A BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):1560.

PMID: 38858699 PMC: 11165875. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19025-4.


A mixed-methods descriptive study on the role of continuous quality improvement in rural surgical and obstetrical stability: Considering enablers, challenges and impact.

Kornelsen J, Cameron A, Stoll K, Skinner T, Humber N, Williams K PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0300977.

PMID: 38843178 PMC: 11156343. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300977.


Building a communication and support network among quality improvement teams in nursing homes: a longitudinal study of the SCOPE trial.

Yousefi Nooraie R, Qin Q, Wagg A, Berta W, Estabrooks C Implement Sci Commun. 2024; 5(1):19.

PMID: 38438921 PMC: 10913450. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00559-y.


References
1.
Peng T, LO F, Lin C, Yu C . Benefiting from networks by occupying central positions: an empirical study of the Taiwan health care industry. Health Care Manage Rev. 2006; 31(4):317-27. DOI: 10.1097/00004010-200610000-00007. View

2.
MacPhee M . Hospital networking. Comparing the work of nurses with flexible and traditional schedules. J Nurs Adm. 2000; 30(4):190-8. DOI: 10.1097/00005110-200004000-00010. View

3.
Calloway M, Fried B, Johnsen M, Morrissey J . Characterization of rural mental health service systems. J Rural Health. 2002; 15(3):296-307. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.1999.tb00751.x. View

4.
Cott C . "We decide, you carry it out": a social network analysis of multidisciplinary long-term care teams. Soc Sci Med. 1997; 45(9):1411-21. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00066-x. View

5.
Meltzer D, Chung J, Khalili P, Marlow E, Arora V, Schumock G . Exploring the use of social network methods in designing healthcare quality improvement teams. Soc Sci Med. 2010; 71(6):1119-30. PMC: 2931366. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.012. View