» Articles » PMID: 22129930

System-related Interventions to Reduce Diagnostic Errors: a Narrative Review

Overview
Journal BMJ Qual Saf
Specialty Health Services
Date 2011 Dec 2
PMID 22129930
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Diagnostic errors (missed, delayed or wrong diagnosis) have recently gained attention and are associated with significant preventable morbidity and mortality. The authors reviewed the recent literature and identified interventions that address system-related factors that contribute directly to diagnostic errors.

Methods: The authors conducted a comprehensive search using multiple search strategies. First, they performed a PubMed search to identify articles exclusively related to diagnostic error or delay published in English between 2000 and 2009. They then sought papers from references in the initial dataset, searches of additional databases, and subject matter experts. Articles were included if they formally evaluated an intervention to prevent or reduce diagnostic error; however, papers were also included if interventions were suggested and not tested to inform the state of the science on the subject. Interventions were characterised according to the step in the diagnostic process they targeted: patient-provider encounter; performance and interpretation of diagnostic tests; follow-up and tracking of diagnostic information; subspecialty and referral-related issues; and patient-specific care-seeking and adherence processes.

Results: 43 articles were identified for full review, of which six reported tested interventions and 37 contained suggestions for possible interventions. Empirical studies, although somewhat positive, were non-experimental or quasi-experimental and included a small number of clinicians or healthcare sites. Outcome measures in general were underdeveloped and varied markedly among studies, depending on the setting or step in the diagnostic process.

Conclusions: Despite a number of suggested interventions in the literature, few empirical studies in the past decade have tested interventions to reduce diagnostic errors. Advancing the science of diagnostic error prevention will require more robust study designs and rigorous definitions of diagnostic processes and outcomes to measure intervention effects.

Citing Articles

Mechanisms of oral ciprofloxacin-induced depressive-like behavior and the potential benefit of lactulose: A correlation analysis.

Rahman H, Anggadiredja K, Sasongko L Toxicol Rep. 2025; 14:101920.

PMID: 39911318 PMC: 11795828. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2025.101920.


The ins and outs of errors in oncology imaging: the DAC framework for radiologists.

Iannessi A, Beaumont H, Aguillera C, Nicol F, Bertrand A Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1402838.

PMID: 39429472 PMC: 11486622. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1402838.


Implementation of a bundle to improve diagnosis in hospitalized patients: lessons learned.

Gupta A, Quinn M, Greene M, Fowler K, Chopra V Diagnosis (Berl). 2024; 12(1):68-73.

PMID: 39422088 DOI: 10.1515/dx-2024-0099.


Why a sociotechnical framework is necessary to address diagnostic error.

Ladell M, Yale S, Bordini B, Scanlon M, Jacobson N, Papautsky E BMJ Qual Saf. 2024; 33(12):823-828.

PMID: 39097407 PMC: 11671979. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017231.


Frontline Providers' and Patients' Perspectives on Improving Diagnostic Safety in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study.

Mangus C, James T, Parker S, Duffy E, Chandanabhumma P, Cassady C Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024; 50(7):480-491.

PMID: 38643047 PMC: 11473193. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.03.003.


References
1.
Campbell S, Croskerry P, Bond W . Profiles in patient safety: A "perfect storm" in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2007; 14(8):743-9. DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.04.011. View

2.
Ross S, Moore L, Earnest M, Wittevrongel L, Lin C . Providing a web-based online medical record with electronic communication capabilities to patients with congestive heart failure: randomized trial. J Med Internet Res. 2004; 6(2):e12. PMC: 1550594. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.6.2.e12. View

3.
Lavin C, Goodman E, Perlman S, KELLY L, Emans S . Follow-up of abnormal Papanicolaou smears in a hospital-based adolescent clinic. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 1997; 10(3):141-5. DOI: 10.1016/s1083-3188(97)70074-3. View

4.
Fleck M, Mitroff S . Rare targets are rarely missed in correctable search. Psychol Sci. 2007; 18(11):943-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02006.x. View

5.
Henriksen K . Partial truths in the pursuit of patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010; 19 Suppl 3:i3-7. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2010.041293. View