» Articles » PMID: 22126834

Comparison of Conventional Cervical Cytology Versus Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid Among Human Immunodeficiency Virus-infected Women in Western Kenya

Overview
Date 2011 Dec 1
PMID 22126834
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine the accuracy of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) versus conventional Pap smear as a screening tool for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia/cancer among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected women.

Materials And Methods: A total of 150 HIV-infected women attending the Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital HIV clinic in Eldoret underwent conventional Pap smear, VIA, colposcopy, and biopsy. Both VIA and Pap smears were done by nurses, whereas colposcopy and biopsy were done by a physician. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was conducted to compare the accuracies between VIA and Pap smear in sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).

Results: Among the study participants: VIA was abnormal in 55.3% (83/150, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 47.0%-63.5%); Pap smear showed atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse in 43.7% (59/135, 95% CI = 35.2%-52.5%) and 10% (15/150) of the Pap smears were unsatisfactory. Of the abnormal Pap smears, 3% (2/59) had atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, 7% (4/59) had high-grade atypical squamous cells, 60% (35/59) had low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, 29% (17/59) had high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and 2% (1/59) was suspicious for cervical cancer. Using cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or higher disease on biopsy as an end point, VIA has a sensitivity of 69.6% (95% CI = 55.1%-81.0%), specificity of 51.0% (95% CI = 41.5%-60.4%), PPV of 38.6% (95% CI = 28.8%-49.3%), and NPV of 79.1% (95% CI = 67.8%-87.2%). For conventional Pap smear, sensitivity was 52.5% (95% CI = 42.1%-71.5%), specificity was 66.3% (95% CI = 52.0%-71.2%), PPV was 39.7% (95% CI = 27.6%-51.8%), and NPV was 76.8% (95% CI = 67.0%-85.6%).

Conclusions: Visual inspection with acetic acid is comparable to Pap smear and acceptable for screening HIV-infected women in resource-limited settings such as Western Kenya.

Citing Articles

Digital cervicography using mobile phones with real-time consultation (DCRC) to improve performance of Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA) in cervical cancer screening of HIV-infected women. A cross-sectional study.

Tonui P, Itsura P, Omenge O, Faiza N, Keter A, Mburu A Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2025; 57():101661.

PMID: 39817117 PMC: 11733201. DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101661.


Nucleus segmentation and classification using residual SE-UNet and feature concatenation approach incervical cytopathology cell images.

Chowdary G, G S, M P, Yogarajah P Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2023; 22:15330338221134833.

PMID: 36744768 PMC: 9905035. DOI: 10.1177/15330338221134833.


Diagnostic accuracy of cervical cancer screening strategies for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+/CIN3+) among women living with HIV: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kelly H, Jaafar I, Chung M, Michelow P, Greene S, Strickler H EClinicalMedicine. 2022; 53:101645.

PMID: 36187721 PMC: 9520209. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101645.


Usefulness of high-risk HPV early oncoprotein (E6 and E7) serological markers in the detection of cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Singini M, Singh E, Bradshaw D, Ramaliba T, Chen W, Motlhale M J Med Virol. 2022; 95(1):e27900.

PMID: 35641882 PMC: 10952611. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.27900.


The East Africa Consortium for human papillomavirus and cervical cancer in women living with HIV/AIDS.

Tong Y, Orango E, Nakalembe M, Tonui P, Itsura P, Muthoka K Ann Med. 2022; 54(1):1202-1211.

PMID: 35521812 PMC: 9090376. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2067897.


References
1.
Akinwuntan A, Adesina O, Okolo C, Oluwasola O, Oladokun A, Ifemeje A . Correlation of cervical cytology and visual inspection with acetic acid in HIV-positive women. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008; 28(6):638-41. DOI: 10.1080/01443610802259977. View

2.
Sankaranarayanan R, Wesley R, Somanathan T, Dhakad N, Shyamalakumary B, Amma N . Visual inspection of the uterine cervix after the application of acetic acid in the detection of cervical carcinoma and its precursors. Cancer. 1998; 83(10):2150-6. View

3.
Moscicki A, Ellenberg J, Crowley-Nowick P, Darragh T, Xu J, Fahrat S . Risk of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in HIV-infected adolescents. J Infect Dis. 2004; 190(8):1413-21. DOI: 10.1086/424466. View

4.
Didelot-Rousseau M, Nagot N, Costes-Martineau V, Valles X, Ouedraogo A, Konate I . Human papillomavirus genotype distribution and cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions among high-risk women with and without HIV-1 infection in Burkina Faso. Br J Cancer. 2006; 95(3):355-62. PMC: 2360631. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603252. View

5.
Biggar R, Chaturvedi A, Goedert J, Engels E . AIDS-related cancer and severity of immunosuppression in persons with AIDS. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007; 99(12):962-72. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djm010. View