Factors Affecting Consent in Pediatric Critical Care Research

Overview

Journal Intensive Care Med

Specialty Critical Care

Date 2011 Nov 29

PMID 22120768

Citations 31

Authors

Kusum Menon

Roxanne E Ward

Isabelle Gaboury

Margot Thomas

Ari Joffe

Karen Burns

Deborah Cook

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Consent for research is a difficult and unpredictable process in pediatric critical care populations. The objectives of this study were to describe consent rates in pediatric critical care research and their association with patient, legal guardian, consent process, and study design-related factors.

Methods: A prospective, cohort study was conducted from 2009 to 2010 in six tertiary care pediatric intensive care units (PICU) in Canada with legal guardians of patients who were approached for consent for any ongoing PICU research study. Data were recorded on details of the consent process for all consent encounters.

Results: We recorded 271 consent encounters. The overall consent rate was 80.1% (217/271). We observed higher consent rates when the research assistant was introduced by a member of the clinical team prior to approaching the family (89.7 vs. 77.7%; P = 0.04). Legal guardians of cardiac surgery patients were less likely to provide consent than those of all other patients (75.3 vs. 86.0%; P = 0.03). There was no difference in consent rates between therapeutic (117/145, 80.7%) versus non-therapeutic studies (100/126, 79.4%; P = 0.88).

Conclusion: This study provides future researchers with consent data for determination of recruitment rates, sample sizes, budget estimations, and study timelines. Future pediatric critical care studies should consider incorporating the lower consent rates in cardiac surgery patients and routine introduction of the research assistant to the family by a member of the patient's care team into their study designs. The potential influence of parental factors on consent rates in pediatric critical care studies requires further research.

Citing Articles

Exploring the potential of a school brushing program using a connected brush in underserved areas: a feasibility cluster randomised trial.

Kitsaras G, Boothman N, Gomez J, Goodwin M, Muzammil M, Walsh T BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):223.

PMID: 39934765 PMC: 11817162. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-05573-7.

Recruitment and retention strategies to promote research engagement among caregivers and their children: A scoping review.

Corr T, Jusufagic A, Basting J, Caldwell C, King S, Zgierska A J Clin Transl Sci. 2024; 8(1):e194.

PMID: 39655035 PMC: 11626585. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2024.624.

Development of the Better Research Interactions for Every Family (BRIEF) intervention to support recruitment for neonatal clinical trials: an intervention mapping guided approach.

Weiss E, Gray M, Ko L, Duenas D, Oslin E, Kraft S Trials. 2024; 25(1):610.

PMID: 39267164 PMC: 11395641. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08446-6.

Experiences and preferences for learning about neonatal research: insights from parent interviews.

Weiss E, Porter K, Oslin E, Puia-Dumitrescu M, Donohue P, Merhar S J Perinatol. 2023; 44(3):404-414.

PMID: 38001157 PMC: 10939889. DOI: 10.1038/s41372-023-01790-6.

"I Don't Want My Child to Be a Guinea Pig": Reasons for Non-Participation in a Parental Tobacco Cessation Trial in the Pediatric Emergency Department Setting.

Toraman Turk S, Merianos A, Stone L, Schnadower D, Bouvay K, Mahabee-Gittens E Toxics. 2023; 11(8).

PMID: 37624161 PMC: 10458252. DOI: 10.3390/toxics11080655.

References

Sammons H, Atkinson M, Choonara I, Stephenson T . What motivates British parents to consent for research? A questionnaire study. BMC Pediatr. 2007; 7:12. PMC: 1828728. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-7-12. View

Simon C, Siminoff L, Kodish E, Burant C . Comparison of the informed consent process for randomized clinical trials in pediatric and adult oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22(13):2708-17. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.10.034. View

Baren J, Anicetti J, Ledesma S, Biros M, Lewis R . An approach to community consultation prior to initiating an emergency research study incorporating a waiver of informed consent. Acad Emerg Med. 1999; 6(12):1210-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00135.x. View

Breslow N, Day N . Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume II--The design and analysis of cohort studies. IARC Sci Publ. 1987; (82):1-406. View

Menon K, Ward R, Lawson M, Gaboury I, Hutchison J, Hebert P . A prospective multicenter study of adrenal function in critically ill children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010; 182(2):246-51. PMC: 5003603. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200911-1738OC. View

Natale J, Joseph J, Pretzlaff R, Silber T, Guerguerian A . Clinical trials in pediatric traumatic brain injury: unique challenges and potential responses. Dev Neurosci. 2006; 28(4-5):276-90. DOI: 10.1159/000094154. View

Sturdivant L, Warren N . Perceived met and unmet needs of family members of patients in the pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2009; 32(2):149-58. DOI: 10.1097/CNQ.0b013e3181a27f6d. View

Singhal N, Oberle K, Burgess E, Huber-Okrainec J . Parents' perceptions of research with newborns. J Perinatol. 2002; 22(1):57-63. DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7210608. View

Huskins W, Huckabee C, OGrady N, Murray P, Kopetskie H, Zimmer L . Intervention to reduce transmission of resistant bacteria in intensive care. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(15):1407-18. PMC: 3410743. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1000373. View

10.

Schroeder A, Axelrod D, Silverman N, Rubesova E, Merkel E, Roth S . A continuous heparin infusion does not prevent catheter-related thrombosis in infants after cardiac surgery. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010; 11(4):489-95. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181ce6e29. View

11.

Hutchison J, Ward R, Lacroix J, Hebert P, Barnes M, Bohn D . Hypothermia therapy after traumatic brain injury in children. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358(23):2447-56. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706930. View

12.

Vlasselaers D, Milants I, Desmet L, Wouters P, Vanhorebeek I, van den Heuvel I . Intensive insulin therapy for patients in paediatric intensive care: a prospective, randomised controlled study. Lancet. 2009; 373(9663):547-56. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60044-1. View

13.

Hulst J, Peters J, van den Bos A, Joosten K, van Goudoever J, Zimmermann L . Illness severity and parental permission for clinical research in a pediatric ICU population. Intensive Care Med. 2005; 31(6):880-4. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-005-2647-8. View

14.

Morris M, Besner D, Vazquez H, Nelson R, Fischbach R . Parental opinions about clinical research. J Pediatr. 2007; 151(5):532-7, 537.e1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.04.032. View

15.

Walterspiel J . Informed consent: influence on patient selection among critically ill premature infants. Pediatrics. 1990; 85(1):119-21. View

16.

Choong K, Bohn D, Fraser D, Gaboury I, Hutchison J, Joffe A . Vasopressin in pediatric vasodilatory shock: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009; 180(7):632-9. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200902-0221OC. View

17.

Lacroix J, Hebert P, Hutchison J, Hume H, Tucci M, Ducruet T . Transfusion strategies for patients in pediatric intensive care units. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356(16):1609-19. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa066240. View

18.

Pierro A, Spitz L . Informed consent in clinical research: the crisis in paediatrics. Lancet. 1997; 349(9066):1703. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)62681-5. View

19.

Hoehn K, Wernovsky G, Rychik J, Gaynor J, Spray T, Feudtner C . What factors are important to parents making decisions about neonatal research?. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005; 90(3):F267-9. PMC: 1721891. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2004.065078. View

20.

Morris M, Fischbach R, Nelson R, Schleien C . A paradigm for inpatient resuscitation research with an exception from informed consent. Crit Care Med. 2006; 34(10):2567-75. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000239115.76603.55. View