» Articles » PMID: 22114239

Evaluation of Depth of Myometrial Invasion and Overall Staging in Endometrial Cancer: Comparison of Diffusion-weighted and Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging

Overview
Journal Radiology
Specialty Radiology
Date 2011 Nov 25
PMID 22114239
Citations 52
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with that of dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) MR imaging in evaluating the depth of myometrial invasion and overall stage in patients with endometrial cancer.

Materials And Methods: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study; patient consent was not required. From May 2008 to February 2010, 48 women with endometrial cancer underwent preoperative MR imaging, including T1- and T2-weighted imaging, DW MR imaging (b=0 and 800 sec/mm2) and DCE MR imaging. Two radiologists independently interpreted the depth of myometrial invasion, overall stage, and presence of pitfalls associated with inaccurate assessment of myometrial invasion at T1- and T2-weighted imaging, DW MR imaging, and DCE MR imaging. Myometrial invasion and overall stage were compared by using the McNemar test, and κ statistics were used for reader agreement.

Results: For assessing the depth of myometrial invasion, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, respectively, were as follows: DW MR imaging-reader 1, 90%, 84%, and 100%; reader 2, 85%, 84%, and 88%; DCE MR imaging-reader 1, 71%, 61%, and 88%; reader 2, 79%, 77%, and 82%. The improvement in diagnostic accuracy for reader 1 was significant (P=.035). For myometrial invasion, κ values were 0.75 with DW MR imaging and 0.26 with DCE MR imaging. There was no association between inaccurate assessment of myometrial invasion and standard pitfalls with DW MR imaging. Readers 1 and 2 correctly staged more patients by using DW MR imaging (39 and 38 patients, respectively) than by using DCE MR imaging (29 and 30 patients, respectively) (P<.05). For overall stage, κ values were 0.74 with DW MR imaging and 0.22 with DCE MR imaging.

Conclusion: DW MR imaging has superior diagnostic accuracy in the assessment of myometrial invasion and significantly higher staging accuracy compared with DCE MR imaging.

Citing Articles

Enhancing Preoperative Assessment of Endometrial Cancer: The Role of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluating Myometrial Invasion.

Raja S, Sharma P, Subramonian S, Ravipati C, Natarajan P Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e62111.

PMID: 38993436 PMC: 11238663. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.62111.


Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: A Pictorial Review on Differential Diagnosis and Not-So-Common Cases of Interventional Radiology Management.

Vigano S, Smedile A, Cazzella C, Marra P, Bonaffini P, Sironi S Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 38667444 PMC: 11049404. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14080798.


Predictive Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Risk Stratification and Molecular Classification of Endometrial Cancer.

Bae H, Eun Rha S, Kim H, Kang J, Shin Y Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(5).

PMID: 38473283 PMC: 10930609. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050921.


Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Women with Endometrial Cancer: Dynamic Versus Single-Phase Acquisitions.

Lee M, Moon M, Kim T, Jang S, Oh S, Cho J Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2023; 17:11795549231207833.

PMID: 38023285 PMC: 10644739. DOI: 10.1177/11795549231207833.


Circulating miRNAs as a Tool for Early Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer-Implications for the Fertility-Sparing Process: Clinical, Biological, and Legal Aspects.

Piergentili R, Gullo G, Basile G, Gulia C, Porrello A, Cucinella G Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(14).

PMID: 37511115 PMC: 10379073. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241411356.