» Articles » PMID: 22110428

Cholinergic Control of Visual Categorization in Macaques

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2011 Nov 24
PMID 22110428
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Acetylcholine (ACh) is a neurotransmitter acting via muscarinic and nicotinic receptors that is implicated in several cognitive functions and impairments, such as Alzheimer's disease. It is believed to especially affect the acquisition of new information, which is particularly important when behavior needs to be adapted to new situations and to novel sensory events. Categorization, the process of assigning stimuli to a category, is a cognitive function that also involves information acquisition. The role of ACh on categorization has not been previously studied. We have examined the effects of scopolamine, an antagonist of muscarinic ACh receptors, on visual categorization in macaque monkeys using familiar and novel stimuli. When the peripheral effects of scopolamine on the parasympathetic nervous system were controlled for, categorization performance was disrupted following systemic injections of scopolamine. This impairment was observed only when the stimuli that needed to be categorized had not been seen before. In other words, the monkeys were not impaired by the central action of scopolamine in categorizing a set of familiar stimuli (stimuli which they had categorized successfully in previous sessions). Categorization performance also deteriorated as the stimulus became less salient by an increase in the level of visual noise. However, scopolamine did not cause additional performance disruptions for difficult categorization judgments at lower coherence levels. Scopolamine, therefore, specifically affects the assignment of new exemplars to established cognitive categories, presumably by impairing the processing of novel information. Since we did not find an effect of scopolamine in the categorization of familiar stimuli, scopolamine had no significant central action on other cognitive functions such as perception, attention, memory, or executive control within the context of our categorization task.

Citing Articles

Cholinergic manipulations affect sensory responses but not attentional enhancement in macaque MT.

Veith V, Quigley C, Treue S BMC Biol. 2021; 19(1):49.

PMID: 33726757 PMC: 7967954. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-021-00993-7.


Boosting visual cortex function and plasticity with acetylcholine to enhance visual perception.

Kang J, Huppe-Gourgues F, Vaucher E Front Syst Neurosci. 2014; 8:172.

PMID: 25278848 PMC: 4167004. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00172.


Resting state functional connectivity of the basal nucleus of Meynert in humans: in comparison to the ventral striatum and the effects of age.

Li C, Ide J, Zhang S, Hu S, Chao H, Zaborszky L Neuroimage. 2014; 97:321-32.

PMID: 24736176 PMC: 4065805. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.019.


Brain Network Activation (BNA) reveals scopolamine-induced impairment of visual working memory.

Reches A, Levy-Cooperman N, Laufer I, Shani-Hershkovitch R, Ziv K, Kerem D J Mol Neurosci. 2014; 54(1):59-70.

PMID: 24535560 DOI: 10.1007/s12031-014-0250-6.


Basal forebrain activation controls contrast sensitivity in primary visual cortex.

Bhattacharyya A, Veit J, Kretz R, Bondar I, Rainer G BMC Neurosci. 2013; 14:55.

PMID: 23679191 PMC: 3662585. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-14-55.

References
1.
Deco G, Thiele A . Attention: oscillations and neuropharmacology. Eur J Neurosci. 2009; 30(3):347-54. PMC: 2777251. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06833.x. View

2.
Rasmusson D, Smith S, Semba K . Inactivation of prefrontal cortex abolishes cortical acetylcholine release evoked by sensory or sensory pathway stimulation in the rat. Neuroscience. 2007; 149(1):232-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.06.057. View

3.
Miller E, DeSimone R . Scopolamine affects short-term memory but not inferior temporal neurons. Neuroreport. 1993; 4(1):81-4. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199301000-00021. View

4.
Rolls E, Burton M, Mora F . Neurophysiological analysis of brain-stimulation reward in the monkey. Brain Res. 1980; 194(2):339-57. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(80)91216-0. View

5.
Fredrickson A, Snyder P, Cromer J, Thomas E, Lewis M, Maruff P . The use of effect sizes to characterize the nature of cognitive change in psychopharmacological studies: an example with scopolamine. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2008; 23(5):425-36. DOI: 10.1002/hup.942. View