Gender Differences in Emotional Responses: a Psychophysiological Study
Overview
Psychiatry
Psychology
Social Sciences
Authors
Affiliations
Gender differences in emotional responses have been investigated in two groups of students, 22 males and 21 females. Participants watched a set of sixty emotional standardized slides divided into pleasant, neutral and unpleasant, while Startle reflex, Evoked Potentials, Heart Rate, facial EMG and Skin Conductance were recorded. Startle reflex amplitude, an index modulated by amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex and sensitive to aversive emotional stimuli, was overall larger in women. In addition, startle emotion modulation was greater in women with respect to men. Slow Evoked Potentials (400-800 ms), a measure representing the cognitive component of the emotional response, revealed gender differences in the left prefrontal site, with women showing greater positivity to unpleasant compared with pleasant slides while men had greater positivity to pleasant vs. neutral slides. Women, compared with men, perceived all slides as less pleasant and reported greater arousal to unpleasant condition. Results are in line with known functional brain differences, at level of limbic and paralimbic structures, between men and women, and point to biologically grounded greater sensitivity and vulnerability of women to adverse/stressful events.
"Sentio ergo est": Unmasking the psychological realities of emotional misperception.
Tsikandilakis M, Bali P, Karlis A, Morfi P, Mevel P, Madan C Perception. 2024; 54(1):3-31.
PMID: 39648752 PMC: 11646357. DOI: 10.1177/03010066241302996.
Shoda H, Yasuda S, Uemiya A, Yuhaku A, Isaka T PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0311905.
PMID: 39636820 PMC: 11620437. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311905.
Haro J, Hinojosa J, Ferre P Behav Res Methods. 2024; 56(8):8501-8520.
PMID: 39231911 PMC: 11525433. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02488-z.
Theta oscillations underlie the interplay between emotional processing and empathy.
Romeo Z, Spironelli C Heliyon. 2024; 10(14):e34581.
PMID: 39148968 PMC: 11325776. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34581.
Schienle A, Kogler W Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(6).
PMID: 38920788 PMC: 11200763. DOI: 10.3390/bs14060455.