» Articles » PMID: 22108508

Gender Differences in Emotional Responses: a Psychophysiological Study

Overview
Journal Physiol Behav
Date 2011 Nov 24
PMID 22108508
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Gender differences in emotional responses have been investigated in two groups of students, 22 males and 21 females. Participants watched a set of sixty emotional standardized slides divided into pleasant, neutral and unpleasant, while Startle reflex, Evoked Potentials, Heart Rate, facial EMG and Skin Conductance were recorded. Startle reflex amplitude, an index modulated by amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex and sensitive to aversive emotional stimuli, was overall larger in women. In addition, startle emotion modulation was greater in women with respect to men. Slow Evoked Potentials (400-800 ms), a measure representing the cognitive component of the emotional response, revealed gender differences in the left prefrontal site, with women showing greater positivity to unpleasant compared with pleasant slides while men had greater positivity to pleasant vs. neutral slides. Women, compared with men, perceived all slides as less pleasant and reported greater arousal to unpleasant condition. Results are in line with known functional brain differences, at level of limbic and paralimbic structures, between men and women, and point to biologically grounded greater sensitivity and vulnerability of women to adverse/stressful events.

Citing Articles

"Sentio ergo est": Unmasking the psychological realities of emotional misperception.

Tsikandilakis M, Bali P, Karlis A, Morfi P, Mevel P, Madan C Perception. 2024; 54(1):3-31.

PMID: 39648752 PMC: 11646357. DOI: 10.1177/03010066241302996.


Uncovering the essence of moving experiences in Japanese culture: Development and validation of a kando reaction scale.

Shoda H, Yasuda S, Uemiya A, Yuhaku A, Isaka T PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0311905.

PMID: 39636820 PMC: 11620437. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311905.


The role of individual differences in emotional word recognition: Insights from a large-scale lexical decision study.

Haro J, Hinojosa J, Ferre P Behav Res Methods. 2024; 56(8):8501-8520.

PMID: 39231911 PMC: 11525433. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02488-z.


Theta oscillations underlie the interplay between emotional processing and empathy.

Romeo Z, Spironelli C Heliyon. 2024; 10(14):e34581.

PMID: 39148968 PMC: 11325776. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34581.


Reducing Emotional Distress with Open-Label Placebos: Assessing the Role of Motor Engagement in Pill Consumption.

Schienle A, Kogler W Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38920788 PMC: 11200763. DOI: 10.3390/bs14060455.