» Articles » PMID: 22105899

Nodal Status--its Impact on Prognosis in Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2011 Nov 23
PMID 22105899
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Prognostic impact of nodal status or lymphadenectomy in advanced ovarian cancer is still unclear. Known best prognostic impact in advanced ovarian cancer has the residual tumor mass. The aim of this retrospective study is to examine the importance of nodal status in correlation with residual tumor mass.

Methods: One hundred and fifty-seven consecutive patients with primary stage III ovarian cancer underwent surgery between 01/2000 and 06/2007 at the Department of gynecology and obstetrics, University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany. All patients got stage-related surgery and platin-based chemotherapy. Median follow-up time was 53.5 months, and all patients were included in the study.

Results: Resection status and nodal status are significant prognostic factors in our study (P < 0.001). In FIGO III, patients without residual tumor (R0) had significant best OS and PFS independent to node status (N0/N+; P = 0.002) compared to patients with residual tumor. In contrast, node status had significant positive impact on PFS in patients without residual tumor and node negativity. With the increase in residual tumor, the influence of lymphnode metastases on prognosis is decreasing.

Conclusion: Main intention of primary surgery is R0 resection with best prognosis in advanced stages. A systematic lymphadenectomy in cases with R0 resection or residual tumor <1 cm seems to be reasonable with positive impact on prognosis. Node status has impact on prognosis in patients with negative node after R0 resection with best PFS in FIGO III. Further prospective studies had to show whether systematic lymphadenectomy in suboptimally tumor-reduced patients can improve prognosis.

Citing Articles

Role of Lymphadenectomy During Interval Debulking Surgery Performed After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer.

He M, Lai Y, Peng H, Tong C Front Oncol. 2021; 11:646135.

PMID: 33842358 PMC: 8034395. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.646135.


Prognostic importance of peritoneal lesion-to-primary tumour standardized uptake value ratio in advanced serous epithelial ovarian cancer.

Chung H, Kim J, Park N, Song Y, Cheon G Eur Radiol. 2017; 28(5):2107-2114.

PMID: 29260365 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5194-0.


Prognostic implication of the metastatic lesion-to-ovarian cancer standardised uptake value ratio in advanced serous epithelial ovarian cancer.

Chung H, Lee M, Kim H, Kim J, Park N, Song Y Eur Radiol. 2017; 27(11):4510-4515.

PMID: 28593431 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4883-z.


Incidence and Impact of Lymph Node Metastases in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Implications for Surgical Treatment.

Bachmann C, Bachmann R, Fend F, Wallwiener D J Cancer. 2016; 7(15):2241-2246.

PMID: 27994660 PMC: 5166533. DOI: 10.7150/jca.15644.


The Lymphocyte-Monocyte Ratio Predicts Patient Survival and Aggressiveness of Ovarian Cancer.

Eo W, Chang H, Kwon S, Koh S, Kim Y, Ji Y J Cancer. 2016; 7(3):289-96.

PMID: 26918042 PMC: 4747883. DOI: 10.7150/jca.13432.


References
1.
Hoskins W, McGuire W, Brady M, Homesley H, Creasman W, Berman M . The effect of diameter of largest residual disease on survival after primary cytoreductive surgery in patients with suboptimal residual epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 170(4):974-9; discussion 979-80. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70090-7. View

2.
Scarabelli C, Gallo A, Visentin M, Canzonieri V, Carbone A, Zarrelli A . Systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in advanced ovarian cancer patients with no residual intraperitoneal disease. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1997; 7(1):18-26. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.1997.00418.x. View

3.
Carnino F, Fuda G, Ciccone G, Iskra L, Guercio E, Dadone D . Significance of lymph node sampling in epithelial carcinoma of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol. 1997; 65(3):467-72. DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1997.4633. View

4.
Benedetti Panici P, Maggioni A, Hacker N, Landoni F, Ackermann S, Campagnutta E . Systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy versus resection of bulky nodes only in optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005; 97(8):560-6. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dji102. View

5.
Whittemore A . Characteristics relating to ovarian cancer risk: implications for prevention and detection. Gynecol Oncol. 1994; 55(3 Pt 2):S15-9. DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1994.1334. View