Reading Performance After Implantation of a Modified Corneal Inlay Design for the Surgical Correction of Presbyopia: 1-year Follow-up
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: To evaluate change in different reading performance parameters after monocular ACI7000PDT corneal inlay implantation for the improvement of near and intermediate vision.
Design: Prospective, interventional case series.
Methods: Twenty-four patients were scheduled for corneal inlay implantation in the nondominant eye in a university outpatient surgery center. Naturally emmetropic and presbyopic patients between 45 and 60 years of age, with uncorrected distance visual acuity of at least 20/20 in both eyes, without any additional ocular pathology were eligible for inclusion. Bilateral uncorrected reading acuity, mean and maximum reading speed, and smallest log-scaled print size were evaluated with the standardized Radner Reading Charts. Measurements of reading parameters and reading distance were performed with the Salzburg Reading Desk (SRD). Minimum postoperative follow-up was 12 months.
Results: The reading desk results showed significant changes in each parameter tested. After 12 months the mean reading distance changed from the preoperative value of 46.7 cm (95% CI: 44.1-49.3) to 42.8 cm (95% CI: 40.3-45.3, P < .004), and the mean reading acuity "at best distance" improved from 0.33 logRAD (95% CI: 0.27-0.39) to 0.24 logRAD (95% CI: 0.20-0.28, P < .005). Mean reading speed increased from 141 words per minute (wpm, 95% CI: 133-150) to 156 wpm (95% CI: 145-167, P < .003), maximum reading speed increased from 171 wpm (95% CI: 159-183) to 196 wpm (95% CI: 180-212, P = .001), and the smallest print size improved from 1.50 mm (95% CI: 1.32-1.67) to 1.12 mm (95% CI: 1.03-1.22, P < .001).
Conclusions: After ACI7000PDT implantation, there were significant changes in all tested reading performance parameters in emmetropic presbyopic patients. These 1-year results indicate that the inlay seems to be an effective treatment for presbyopia.
Bidaguren A, Mendicute J, Madarieta I, Garagorri N Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019; 8(6):39.
PMID: 31867140 PMC: 6922274. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.8.6.39.
Harb W, Chamoun N, Harb G Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2019; 26(2):65-70.
PMID: 31543662 PMC: 6737781. DOI: 10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_159_16.
Near vision examination in presbyopia patients: Do we need good homologated near vision charts?.
Radner W Eye Vis (Lond). 2016; 3:29.
PMID: 27844022 PMC: 5103453. DOI: 10.1186/s40662-016-0061-7.
Small-aperture monovision and the Pulfrich experience: absence of neural adaptation effects.
Plainis S, Petratou D, Giannakopoulou T, Radhakrishnan H, Pallikaris I, Charman W PLoS One. 2013; 8(10):e75987.
PMID: 24155881 PMC: 3796532. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075987.
Small-aperture corneal inlay in patients with prior radial keratotomy surgeries.
Huseynova T, Kanamori T, Waring 4th G, Tomita M Clin Ophthalmol. 2013; 7:1937-40.
PMID: 24109174 PMC: 3792925. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S50399.