» Articles » PMID: 22105801

Reading Performance After Implantation of a Modified Corneal Inlay Design for the Surgical Correction of Presbyopia: 1-year Follow-up

Overview
Journal Am J Ophthalmol
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2011 Nov 23
PMID 22105801
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate change in different reading performance parameters after monocular ACI7000PDT corneal inlay implantation for the improvement of near and intermediate vision.

Design: Prospective, interventional case series.

Methods: Twenty-four patients were scheduled for corneal inlay implantation in the nondominant eye in a university outpatient surgery center. Naturally emmetropic and presbyopic patients between 45 and 60 years of age, with uncorrected distance visual acuity of at least 20/20 in both eyes, without any additional ocular pathology were eligible for inclusion. Bilateral uncorrected reading acuity, mean and maximum reading speed, and smallest log-scaled print size were evaluated with the standardized Radner Reading Charts. Measurements of reading parameters and reading distance were performed with the Salzburg Reading Desk (SRD). Minimum postoperative follow-up was 12 months.

Results: The reading desk results showed significant changes in each parameter tested. After 12 months the mean reading distance changed from the preoperative value of 46.7 cm (95% CI: 44.1-49.3) to 42.8 cm (95% CI: 40.3-45.3, P < .004), and the mean reading acuity "at best distance" improved from 0.33 logRAD (95% CI: 0.27-0.39) to 0.24 logRAD (95% CI: 0.20-0.28, P < .005). Mean reading speed increased from 141 words per minute (wpm, 95% CI: 133-150) to 156 wpm (95% CI: 145-167, P < .003), maximum reading speed increased from 171 wpm (95% CI: 159-183) to 196 wpm (95% CI: 180-212, P = .001), and the smallest print size improved from 1.50 mm (95% CI: 1.32-1.67) to 1.12 mm (95% CI: 1.03-1.22, P < .001).

Conclusions: After ACI7000PDT implantation, there were significant changes in all tested reading performance parameters in emmetropic presbyopic patients. These 1-year results indicate that the inlay seems to be an effective treatment for presbyopia.

Citing Articles

Confocal and Histological Features After Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Diacrylate Corneal Inlay Implantation.

Bidaguren A, Mendicute J, Madarieta I, Garagorri N Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019; 8(6):39.

PMID: 31867140 PMC: 6922274. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.8.6.39.


KAMRA Inlay Implantation for Presbyopia Compensation: A Retrospective Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction and Subjective Vision 12-Month Postoperative.

Harb W, Chamoun N, Harb G Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2019; 26(2):65-70.

PMID: 31543662 PMC: 6737781. DOI: 10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_159_16.


Near vision examination in presbyopia patients: Do we need good homologated near vision charts?.

Radner W Eye Vis (Lond). 2016; 3:29.

PMID: 27844022 PMC: 5103453. DOI: 10.1186/s40662-016-0061-7.


Small-aperture monovision and the Pulfrich experience: absence of neural adaptation effects.

Plainis S, Petratou D, Giannakopoulou T, Radhakrishnan H, Pallikaris I, Charman W PLoS One. 2013; 8(10):e75987.

PMID: 24155881 PMC: 3796532. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075987.


Small-aperture corneal inlay in patients with prior radial keratotomy surgeries.

Huseynova T, Kanamori T, Waring 4th G, Tomita M Clin Ophthalmol. 2013; 7:1937-40.

PMID: 24109174 PMC: 3792925. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S50399.