» Articles » PMID: 22105221

Preferential Cell Response to Anisotropic Electro-spun Fibrous Scaffolds Under Tension-free Conditions

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2011 Nov 23
PMID 22105221
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Anisotropic alignment of collagen fibres in musculoskeletal tissues is responsible for the resistance to mechanical loading, whilst in cornea is responsible for transparency. Herein, we evaluated the response of tenocytes, osteoblasts and corneal fibroblasts to the topographies created through electro-spinning and solvent casting. We also evaluated the influence of topography on mechanical properties. At day 14, human osteoblasts seeded on aligned orientated electro-spun mats exhibited the lowest metabolic activity (P < 0.001). At day 5 and at day 7, no significant difference was observed in metabolic activity of human corneal fibroblasts and bovine tenocytes respectively seeded on different scaffold conformations (P > 0.05). Osteoblasts and corneal fibroblasts aligned parallel to the direction of the aligned orientated electro-spun mats, whilst tenocytes aligned perpendicular to the aligned orientated electro-spun mats. Mechanical evaluation demonstrated that aligned orientated electro-spun fibres exhibited significant higher stress at break values than their random aligned counterparts (P < 0.006) and random orientated electro-spun fibres exhibited significant higher strain at break values than the aligned orientated scaffolds (P < 0.006). While maintaining fibre structure, we also developed a co-deposition method of spraying and electro-spinning, which enables the incorporation of microspheres within the three-dimensional structure of the scaffold.

Citing Articles

Anisotropic architecture and electrical stimulation enhance neuron cell behaviour on a tough graphene embedded PVA: alginate fibrous scaffold.

Golafshan N, Kharaziha M, Fathi M, Larson B, Giatsidis G, Masoumi N RSC Adv. 2022; 8(12):6381-6389.

PMID: 35540432 PMC: 9078254. DOI: 10.1039/c7ra13136d.


Environmental fate and effect of biodegradable electro-spun scaffolds (biomaterial)-a case study.

Irizar A, Amorim M, Fuller K, Zeugolis D, Scott-Fordsmand J J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2018; 29(5):51.

PMID: 29713809 DOI: 10.1007/s10856-018-6063-3.


Assessment of stem cell carriers for tendon tissue engineering in pre-clinical models.

Abbah S, Spanoudes K, OBrien T, Pandit A, Zeugolis D Stem Cell Res Ther. 2014; 5(2):38.

PMID: 25157898 PMC: 4056691. DOI: 10.1186/scrt426.


The effect of scaffold macroporosity on angiogenesis and cell survival in tissue-engineered smooth muscle.

Walthers C, Nazemi A, Patel S, Wu B, Dunn J Biomaterials. 2014; 35(19):5129-37.

PMID: 24695092 PMC: 4018739. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.025.


The influence of operating parameters on the drug release and antibacterial performances of alginate fibrous dressings prepared by wet spinning.

Lin H, Wang H Biomatter. 2013; 2(4):321-8.

PMID: 23507896 PMC: 3568116. DOI: 10.4161/biom.22817.

References
1.
Bensadoun J, de Almeida L, Fine E, Tseng J, Deglon N, Aebischer P . Comparative study of GDNF delivery systems for the CNS: polymer rods, encapsulated cells, and lentiviral vectors. J Control Release. 2003; 87(1-3):107-15. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-3659(02)00353-x. View

2.
Teixeira A, McKie G, Foley J, Bertics P, Nealey P, Murphy C . The effect of environmental factors on the response of human corneal epithelial cells to nanoscale substrate topography. Biomaterials. 2006; 27(21):3945-54. PMC: 4820342. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.044. View

3.
Moutos F, Freed L, Guilak F . A biomimetic three-dimensional woven composite scaffold for functional tissue engineering of cartilage. Nat Mater. 2007; 6(2):162-7. DOI: 10.1038/nmat1822. View

4.
Shortkroff S, Spector M . Isolation and in vitro proliferation of chondrocytes, tenocytes, and ligament cells. Methods Mol Med. 2011; 18:195-203. DOI: 10.1385/0-89603-516-6:195. View

5.
Cao H, Xu S . EDC/NHS-crosslinked type II collagen-chondroitin sulfate scaffold: characterization and in vitro evaluation. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007; 19(2):567-75. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-007-3281-5. View