» Articles » PMID: 22105010

Investigating Dose-dependent Effects of Placebo Analgesia: a Psychophysiological Approach

Overview
Journal Pain
Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry
Date 2011 Nov 23
PMID 22105010
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Investigating dose-dependent effects of placebo analgesia (PA) in laboratory subjects undergoing pain testing, we evaluated 2 hypotheses: (1) greater expectancy for relief produces greater PA, and (2) cued expectancy for relief triggered by a predictive cue leads to more enhanced analgesia than does passive expectancy (no predictive cue). We used conditioning procedures in which 84 subjects experienced reduced stimulation intensity following the application of purported analgesic creams to the 2 experimental fingers, while the control finger received the same levels of stimulation as in the baseline block. The dose of placebos was manipulated by creating 2 levels of expectations for relief. The form of expectation (cued vs uncued) was also manipulated by a predictive cue specifying the next finger to be stimulated. Subjective reports and psychophysiological responses served as critical indicators for evaluating impacts of the placebo manipulation on subsequent pain processing. The dose-dependent PA was unambiguously demonstrated by the predicted ordering of the 3 fingers (ie, manipulated expectation levels) in terms of both response sensitivity and average response magnitude, in mixed-effects analysis of 3 outcome indicators (evoked potential, skin conductance response, pain report). Greater expectation for relief led to both (1) greater reductions in the average dependent variable slope (response sensitivity) as a function of stimulus intensity, and (2) greater reductions in average response magnitude. Unexpectedly, uncued expectation led to a slightly larger PA than did cued expectation. The study provided clear evidence that PA can occur in a "dose"-dependent manner, mediated by the levels of expectancy for pain relief.

Citing Articles

Nicotine-related beliefs induce dose-dependent responses in the human brain.

Perl O, Shuster A, Heflin M, Na S, Kidwai A, Booker N Nat Ment Health. 2024; 2(2):177-188.

PMID: 39463822 PMC: 11512134. DOI: 10.1038/s44220-023-00188-9.


The placebo effect shortens movement time in goal-directed movements.

Fiorio M, Villa-Sanchez B, Rossignati F, Andani M Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):19567.

PMID: 36380087 PMC: 9666443. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23489-y.


Impact of contextual factors on patient outcomes following conservative low back pain treatment: systematic review.

Sherriff B, Clark C, Killingback C, Newell D Chiropr Man Therap. 2022; 30(1):20.

PMID: 35449074 PMC: 9028033. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-022-00430-8.


Experience with opioids does not modify the brain network involved in expectations of placebo analgesia.

Wicht C, Mouthon M, Chabwine J, Gaab J, Spierer L Eur J Neurosci. 2022; 55(7):1840-1858.

PMID: 35266226 PMC: 9311217. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15645.


A Randomized Trial to Evaluate OnabotulinumtoxinA for Prevention of Headaches in Adolescents With Chronic Migraine.

Winner P, Kabbouche M, Yonker M, Wangsadipura V, Lum A, Brin M Headache. 2020; 60(3):564-575.

PMID: 32037549 PMC: 7065250. DOI: 10.1111/head.13754.