» Articles » PMID: 22102302

Partnering to Harmonize IRBs for Community-engaged Research to Reduce Health Disparities

Overview
Date 2011 Nov 22
PMID 22102302
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Emerging advances in health disparities research include controlled trials and comparative effectiveness studies that are frequently conducted at multiple community and academic sites. Review by different institutional review boards (IRBs) presents a major impediment to the timely and effective conduct of such research. When research involves minority and underserved communities as well as multiple geographic regions, institutional requirements and interpretation of ethical standards may vary substantially. Such variations can complicate the informed consent process and research protocol, and may undermine participant respect and trial quality. In addition, multiple IRB review can lead to unnecessary delays, jeopardizing funding and capacity to perform collaborative projects. In response to these issues, the Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMI) Translational Research Network (RTRN) is developing a community-partnered approach to streamlining IRB review across its consortium of 18 RCMI grantee institutions that will ensure compliance while enhancing the quality of health disparities research.

Citing Articles

Just Research: Advancing Antiracist and Antioppressive Social Work Research.

Waller B, Maleku A, Quinn C, Barman-Adhikari A, Sprague Martinez L, Traube D J Soc Social Work Res. 2023; 13(4):637-644.

PMID: 38009095 PMC: 10673617. DOI: 10.1086/722974.


Leading by Success: Impact of a Clinical and Translational Research Infrastructure Program to Address Health Inequities.

Shiramizu B, Shambaugh V, Petrovich H, Seto T, Ho T, Mokuau N J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2016; .

PMID: 27797013 PMC: 5409875. DOI: 10.1007/s40615-016-0302-4.


Using the IRB Harmonization and Reliance Document Can Reduce Review and Regulatory Delays for the Benefit of All.

Sodeke S Am J Bioeth. 2016; 16(8):46-8.

PMID: 27366850 PMC: 5730272. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1187217.


User-Friendly Data-Sharing Practices for Fostering Collaboration within a Research Network: Roles of a Vanguard Center for a Community-Based Study.

Lee J, Sung J, Barnett M, Norris K Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015; 13(1):ijerph13010034.

PMID: 26703645 PMC: 4730425. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13010034.


Fostering IRB collaboration for review of international research.

Barchi F, Kasimatis Singleton M, Merz J Am J Bioeth. 2014; 14(5):3-8.

PMID: 24766110 PMC: 4012328. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2014.892168.


References
1.
Gifford A, Cunningham W, Heslin K, Andersen R, Nakazono T, Lieu D . Participation in research and access to experimental treatments by HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(18):1373-82. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa011565. View

2.
Moreno J . IRBs under the microscope. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2001; 8(3):329-37. DOI: 10.1353/ken.1998.0022. View

3.
Lind S . The institutional review board: an evolving ethics committee. J Clin Ethics. 1992; 3(4):278-82. View

4.
Sirotin N, Wolf L, Pollack L, Catania J, Dolcini M, Lo B . IRBs and ethically challenging protocols: views of IRB chairs about useful resources. IRB. 2010; 32(5):10-9. PMC: 3066038. View

5.
Edgar H, Rothman D . The institutional review board and beyond: future challenges to the ethics of human experimentation. Milbank Q. 1995; 73(4):489-506. View