» Articles » PMID: 22089323

Generation of Normative Pediatric Skull Models for Use in Cranial Vault Remodeling Procedures

Overview
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2011 Nov 18
PMID 22089323
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: While the goal of craniofacial reconstruction surgery is to restore the cranial head shape as much towards normal as possible, for the individual patient, there is, in fact, no normal three-dimensional (3D) model to act as a guide. In this project, we generated a library of normative pediatric skulls from which a guiding template could be fabricated for a more standardized, objective and precise correction of craniosynostosis.

Methods: Computed tomography data from 103 normal subjects aged 8-12 months were compiled and a 3D computational model of the skull was generated for each subject. The models were mathematically registered to a baseline model for each month of age within this range and then averaged, resulting in a single 3D point cloud. An external cranial surface was subsequently passed through the point cloud and its shape and size customized to fit the head circumference of individual patients.

Results: The resultant fabricated skull models provide a novel and applicable tool for a detailed, quantitative comparison between the normative and patient skulls for preoperative planning and practice for a variety of craniofacial procedures including vault remodeling. Additionally, it was possible to extract the suprafrontal orbit anatomy from the normative model and fabricate a bandeau template to guide intraoperative reshaping.

Conclusions: Normative head shapes for pediatric patients have wide application for craniofacial surgery including planning, practice, standarized operative repair, and standardized measurement and reporting of outcomes.

Citing Articles

Fronto-orbital advancement with patient-specific 3D-printed implants and robot-guided laser osteotomy: an in vitro accuracy assessment.

Maintz M, Desan N, Sharma N, Beinemann J, Beyer M, Seiler D Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2024; .

PMID: 39671058 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-024-03298-6.


Improving Cranial Vault Remodeling for Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis-Introducing Automated Surgical Planning.

Robertson E, Boulanger P, Kwan P, Louie G, Aalto D Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2024; 17(3):203-213.

PMID: 39377079 PMC: 11456203. DOI: 10.1177/19433875231178912.


Dura-based automated vault expansion remodelling (DAVE-R): automated planning of volume expansion in fronto-orbital advancement for trigonocephaly.

Dapaah A, Duncan C, Parks C, Sinha A, Hennedige A, Richardson D Childs Nerv Syst. 2024; 40(12):4003-4011.

PMID: 39289198 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-024-06608-0.


Normscan: open-source Python software to create average models from CT scans.

Nahass G, Marques M, Bou Zeid N, Zhao L, Alkureishi L Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2024; 20(1):157-165.

PMID: 38767767 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-024-03185-0.


Elevated Intracranial Pressure After Primary Surgical Correction of Sagittal Suture Craniosynostosis.

Dibbs R, Ferry A, Davies L, Bauer D, Buchanan E, Beh H Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2023; 16(1):70-77.

PMID: 36824189 PMC: 9941297. DOI: 10.1177/19433875211064680.


References
1.
Burge J, Saber N, Looi T, French B, Usmani Z, Anooshiravani N . Application of CAD/CAM prefabricated age-matched templates in cranio-orbital remodeling in craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2011; 22(5):1810-3. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822e8045. View

2.
Marcus J, Domeshek L, Loyd A, Schoenleber J, Das R, Nightingale R . Use of a three-dimensional, normative database of pediatric craniofacial morphology for modern anthropometric analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124(6):2076-2084. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181bf7e1b. View

3.
Murray D, Edwards G, Mainprize J, Antonyshyn O . Optimizing craniofacial osteotomies: applications of haptic and rapid prototyping technology. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 66(8):1766-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.08.031. View

4.
Luebbers H, Messmer P, Obwegeser J, Zwahlen R, Kikinis R, Graetz K . Comparison of different registration methods for surgical navigation in cranio-maxillofacial surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008; 36(2):109-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2007.09.002. View

5.
Pappa H, Richardson D, Webb A, May P . Individualized template-guided remodeling of the fronto-orbital bandeau in craniosynostosis corrective surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2009; 20(1):178-9. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318191ceed. View