» Articles » PMID: 22086813

Do Primary Care Physicians Lose Contact with Their Colorectal Cancer Patients?

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2011 Nov 17
PMID 22086813
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Primary care physicians and patients perceive that they lose contact with each other after a cancer diagnosis. The objective of this study was to determine whether colorectal cancer (CRC) patients are less likely to see their primary care physicians after cancer diagnosis.

Methods: This was a longitudinal cohort study using 1993 to 2001 Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare claims data. Eligible patients were those with stage 0 to 1 and 2 to 3 CRC aged 67 to 89 years at diagnosis. Main measures included the proportion of individuals with a face-to-face primary care visit and mean annual primary care visits per patient at baseline and during 5 years after treatment.

Results: Fewer than half of the cancer patients visited with a primary care physician at baseline. In the first year after treatment, patients with stage 0 to 1 CRC (48.9% vs 53.3%; P ≤ .001) and stage 2 to 3 CRC (43.6% vs 53.4%; P ≤ .001) significantly increased their likelihood of visiting a primary care physician from baseline. The proportion of patients with stage 0 to 1 CRC with a primary care visit remained relatively stable, and the proportion of patients with stage 2 to 3 CRC decreased somewhat between the first and fifth year after treatment. The findings for mean annual primary care visits per patient roughly paralleled those for the proportion of individuals with a primary care visit.

Conclusions: Elderly patients with CRC, especially stage 2 to 3 CRC, increase rather than decrease contact with primary care providers after diagnosis. More work is needed to understand the care that different physician specialties provide cancer patients and to support their collaboration.

Citing Articles

Incidence and Predictors of Diabetes Mellitus after a Diagnosis of Early-Stage Breast Cancer in the Elderly Using Real-World Data.

Accordino M, Wright J, Buono D, Lin A, Huang Y, Neugut A Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020; 183(1):201-211.

PMID: 32591988 PMC: 8403515. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05756-6.


Impact of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma on visits to different provider specialties among elderly Medicare beneficiaries: challenges for care coordination.

Garg R, Sambamoorthi U, Tan X, Basu S, Haggerty T, M Kelly K Transl Behav Med. 2018; 8(3):386-399.

PMID: 29370438 PMC: 6257030. DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibx071.


Regional Variation in Primary Care Involvement at the End of Life.

Ankuda C, Petterson S, Wingrove P, Bazemore A Ann Fam Med. 2017; 15(1):63-67.

PMID: 28376462 PMC: 5217845. DOI: 10.1370/afm.2002.


Primary care physician use across the breast cancer care continuum: CanIMPACT study using Canadian administrative data.

Jiang L, Lofters A, Moineddin R, Decker K, Groome P, Kendell C Can Fam Physician. 2016; 62(10):e589-e598.

PMID: 27737994 PMC: 5063785.


Health-care utilization by prognosis profile in a managed care setting: using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Cancer Survival Calculator SEER*CSC.

Rabin B, Ellis J, Steiner J, Nekhlyudov L, Feuer E, Hankey B J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2014; 2014(49):275-81.

PMID: 25417241 PMC: 4841171. DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgu023.

References
1.
Kendall M, Boyd K, Campbell C, Cormie P, Fife S, Thomas K . How do people with cancer wish to be cared for in primary care? Serial discussion groups of patients and carers. Fam Pract. 2006; 23(6):644-50. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cml035. View

2.
Nissen M, Beran M, Lee M, Mehta S, Pine D, Swenson K . Views of primary care providers on follow-up care of cancer patients. Fam Med. 2007; 39(7):477-82. View

3.
Grunfeld E, Levine M, Julian J, Coyle D, Szechtman B, Mirsky D . Randomized trial of long-term follow-up for early-stage breast cancer: a comparison of family physician versus specialist care. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(6):848-55. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.2235. View

4.
Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales K, MacKenzie C . A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40(5):373-83. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8. View

5.
Dworkind M, Towers A, Murnaghan D, Guibert R, Iverson D . Communication between family physicians and oncologists: qualitative results of an exploratory study. Cancer Prev Control. 1999; 3(2):137-44. View