» Articles » PMID: 22083071

Efavirenz Pharmacokinetics During the Third Trimester of Pregnancy and Postpartum

Abstract

Background: The impact of pregnancy on efavirenz (EFV) pharmacokinetics is unknown.

Methods: International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials P1026s is an on-going, prospective, nonblinded study of antiretroviral pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected pregnant women that included a cohort receiving 600 mg EFV once daily as part of combination antiretroviral therapy. Intensive steady-state 24-hour blood sampling was performed during the third trimester and at 6-12 weeks postpartum. Maternal and umbilical cord blood samples were drawn at delivery. Pharmacokinetics targets were the estimated 10th percentile EFV area under the curve (AUC) in nonpregnant historical controls (40.0 mcg·hr(-1)·mL(-1)) and a trough concentration of 1 mcg/mL.

Results: Twenty-five women were enrolled during the third trimester: median (range) age was 29.3 (18.9-42.9) years, weight 69.0 (40-130) kg, and gestational age 32.9 (30.1-38.7) weeks. Median (range) EFV AUC(0-24), C(max), and C(24 hours) were 55.4 mcg·hr(-1)·mL(-1) (13.5-220.3), 5.4 mcg/mL (1.9-12.2), and 1.6 mcg/mL (0.23-8.13), respectively. EFV AUC and C(max) did not differ during pregnancy and postpartum but C(24 hours) was lower during the third trimester (1.6 vs. 2.1 mcg/mL, P = 0.01). During the third trimester, 5 of 25 (20%) women had an EFV AUC below the target and 3 of 25 (12%) had a trough concentration below 1 mcg/mL. EFV cord blood/maternal concentration ratio was 0.49 (0.37-0.74). All women had a HIV-1 RNA viral load less than 400 copies per milliliter at delivery and 19 (76%) had a viral load below 50 copies per milliliter. One child was perinatally HIV infected. Three women were exposed to EFV throughout the first 6 weeks of pregnancy. EFV was well tolerated, and among the 25 infants, no congenital anomalies or newborn complications were reported.

Conclusions: Changes in EFV pharmacokinetics during pregnancy compared with postpartum are not sufficiently large enough to warrant a dose adjustment during pregnancy.

Citing Articles

Ideal Time to Conduct a Pharmacokinetic Investigation After Delivery to Fully Capture the Effect of Pregnancy on Drug Exposure.

Berton M, Stader F, Bettonte S, Battegay M, Marzolini C Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024; 11(10):ofae585.

PMID: 39439743 PMC: 11495486. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae585.


PBPK Modeling of Lamotrigine and Efavirenz during Pregnancy: Implications for Personalized Dosing and Drug-Drug Interaction Management.

Costa B, Gouveia M, Vale N Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(9).

PMID: 39339201 PMC: 11435310. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16091163.


Total and Free Blood and Plasma Concentration Changes in Pregnancy for Medicines Highly Bound to Plasma Proteins: Application of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling to Understand the Impact on Efficacy.

Coppola P, Butler A, Cole S, Kerwash E Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15(10).

PMID: 37896215 PMC: 10609738. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15102455.


Design Considerations for Pharmacokinetic Studies During Pregnancy.

Stika C, Hebert M J Clin Pharmacol. 2023; 63 Suppl 1:S126-S136.

PMID: 37317491 PMC: 10350295. DOI: 10.1002/jcph.2238.


Estimation of Fetal-to-Maternal Unbound Steady-State Plasma Concentration Ratio of P-Glycoprotein and/or Breast Cancer Resistance Protein Substrate Drugs Using a Maternal-Fetal Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model.

Peng J, Ladumor M, Unadkat J Drug Metab Dispos. 2022; 50(5):613-623.

PMID: 35149540 PMC: 9073947. DOI: 10.1124/dmd.121.000733.


References
1.
Fundaro C, Genovese O, Rendeli C, Tamburrini E, Salvaggio E . Myelomeningocele in a child with intrauterine exposure to efavirenz. AIDS. 2002; 16(2):299-300. DOI: 10.1097/00002030-200201250-00025. View

2.
Mirochnick M, Capparelli E . Pharmacokinetics of antiretrovirals in pregnant women. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004; 43(15):1071-87. DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200443150-00002. View

3.
De Santis M, Carducci B, De Santis L, Cavaliere A, Straface G . Periconceptional exposure to efavirenz and neural tube defects. Arch Intern Med. 2002; 162(3):355. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.162.3.355. View

4.
Cressey T, Lallemant M . Pharmacogenetics of antiretroviral drugs for the treatment of HIV-infected patients: an update. Infect Genet Evol. 2006; 7(2):333-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2006.08.004. View

5.
Capparelli E, Aweeka F, Hitti J, Stek A, Hu C, Burchett S . Chronic administration of nevirapine during pregnancy: impact of pregnancy on pharmacokinetics. HIV Med. 2008; 9(4):214-20. PMC: 2755564. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2008.00553.x. View