» Articles » PMID: 22077144

Apixaban Versus Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis in Medically Ill Patients

Overview
Journal N Engl J Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2011 Nov 15
PMID 22077144
Citations 153
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The efficacy and safety of prolonging prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in medically ill patients beyond hospital discharge remain uncertain. We hypothesized that extended prophylaxis with apixaban would be safe and more effective than short-term prophylaxis with enoxaparin.

Methods: In this double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned acutely ill patients who had congestive heart failure or respiratory failure or other medical disorders and at least one additional risk factor for venous thromboembolism and who were hospitalized with an expected stay of at least 3 days to receive apixaban, administered orally at a dose of 2.5 mg twice daily for 30 days, or enoxaparin, administered subcutaneously at a dose of 40 mg once daily for 6 to 14 days. The primary efficacy outcome was the 30-day composite of death related to venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis, or asymptomatic proximal-leg deep-vein thrombosis, as detected with the use of systematic bilateral compression ultrasonography on day 30. The primary safety outcome was bleeding. All efficacy and safety outcomes were independently adjudicated.

Results: A total of 6528 subjects underwent randomization, 4495 of whom could be evaluated for the primary efficacy outcome--2211 in the apixaban group and 2284 in the enoxaparin group. Among the patients who could be evaluated, 2.71% in the apixaban group (60 patients) and 3.06% in the enoxaparin group (70 patients) met the criteria for the primary efficacy outcome (relative risk with apixaban, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 1.23; P=0.44). By day 30, major bleeding had occurred in 0.47% of the patients in the apixaban group (15 of 3184 patients) and in 0.19% of the patients in the enoxaparin group (6 of 3217 patients) (relative risk, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.02 to 7.24; P=0.04).

Conclusions: In medically ill patients, an extended course of thromboprophylaxis with apixaban was not superior to a shorter course with enoxaparin. Apixaban was associated with significantly more major bleeding events than was enoxaparin. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00457002.).

Citing Articles

Standard- versus extended-duration anticoagulation for primary venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients.

Kolkailah A, Abdelghaffar B, Elshafeey F, Magdy R, Kamel M, Abuelnaga Y Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 12:CD014541.

PMID: 39629741 PMC: 11616008. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014541.pub2.


Protocol for the Catheter-Related Early Thromboprophylaxis With Enoxaparin (CRETE) Studies.

Faustino E, Kandil S, Leroue M, Sochet A, Kong M, Cholette J Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2024; 26(1):e95-e105.

PMID: 39560771 PMC: 11717624. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003648.


Methods of a cluster-randomized, type II hybrid implementation effectiveness trial to prospectively assess extended-duration thromboprophylaxis for at-risk medical patients being discharged to prevent hospital-associated venous thromboembolism.

Woller S, Stevens S, Bledsoe J, Hellewell J, Kraft A, Butler A Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024; 8(6):102549.

PMID: 39403187 PMC: 11472710. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102549.


Extended thromboprophylaxis in heart failure patients; the unmet need.

Al Yami M, Alshehri A, Alay S, Aljoufi A, Alsulimani M, Algarni S Heart Fail Rev. 2024; 29(5):1107-1116.

PMID: 39014135 DOI: 10.1007/s10741-024-10422-w.


Standard and Extended Thromboprophylaxis in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Literature Review.

Harindranath S, Varghese J, Afzalpurkar S, Giri S Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol. 2024; 13(2):133-141.

PMID: 38222957 PMC: 10785145. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1401.