» Articles » PMID: 22065240

Development of a New Knee Society Scoring System

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2011 Nov 9
PMID 22065240
Citations 133
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Knee Society Clinical Rating System was developed in 1989 and has been widely adopted. However, with the increased demand for TKA, there is a need for a new, validated scoring system to better characterize the expectations, satisfaction, and physical activities of the younger, more diverse population of TKA patients.

Questions/purposes: We developed and validated a new Knee Society Scoring System.

Methods: We developed the new knee scoring system in two stages. Initially, a comprehensive survey of activities was developed and administered to 101 unilateral TKA patients (53 women, 48 men). A prototype knee scoring instrument was developed from the responses to the survey and administered to 497 patients (204 men, 293 women; 243 postoperatively, 254 preoperatively) at 15 medical institutions within the United States and Canada. Objective and subjective data were analyzed using standard statistical and psychometric procedures and compared to the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score and SF-12 scores for validation. Based on this analysis, minor modifications led to the new Knee Society Scoring System.

Results: We found the new Knee Society Scoring System to be broadly applicable and to accurately characterize patient outcomes after TKA. Statistical analysis confirmed the internal consistency, construct and convergent validity, and reliability of the separate subscale measures.

Conclusions: The new Knee Society Scoring System is a validated instrument based on surgeon- and patient-generated data, adapted to the diverse lifestyles and activities of contemporary patients with TKA. This assessment tool allows surgeons to appreciate differences in the priorities of individual patients and the interplay among function, expectation, symptoms, and satisfaction after TKA.

Citing Articles

Association between femorotibial rotational mismatch and early clinical outcomes after bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Tone S, Naito Y, Wakabayashi H, Sudo A, Hasegawa M BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025; 26(1):251.

PMID: 40082845 PMC: 11905545. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08478-2.


Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures used following hip or knee arthroplasty: a scoping review.

Karimijashni M, Abbasalipour S, Westby M, Ramsay T, Beaule P, Poitras S Qual Life Res. 2025; .

PMID: 39869265 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-025-03899-x.


Association of Physical Function, Quantity, and Quality of the Quadriceps with Postoperative Physical Activity Before Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Watabe T, Sengoku T, Sakurai G, Yoshida S, Taniguchi Y J Clin Med. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39797376 PMC: 11721458. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010294.


Are Current Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Fit for Purpose to Evaluate Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty?.

Bayram J, Clement N, Hall A, Walmsley P, Clarke J J Clin Med. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39797286 PMC: 11721029. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010203.


Obesity and hyperlipidemia were associated with more severe synovitis and structural abnormalities as well as inferior functional outcomes in knee osteoarthritis: a retrospective comparative study.

Hao K, Wang J, Niu Y, Wang F J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):845.

PMID: 39696586 PMC: 11657670. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05326-2.


References
1.
Bayley K, London M, Grunkemeier G, Lansky D . Measuring the success of treatment in patient terms. Med Care. 1995; 33(4 Suppl):AS226-35. View

2.
Callahan C, Drake B, Heck D, Dittus R . Patient outcomes following tricompartmental total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1994; 271(17):1349-57. View

3.
Heck D, Robinson R, Partridge C, Lubitz R, Freund D . Patient outcomes after knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (356):93-110. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199811000-00015. View

4.
Insall J, Dorr L, Scott R, Scott W . Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; (248):13-4. View

5.
Scuderi G, Bourne R, Noble P, Benjamin J, Lonner J, Scott W . The new Knee Society Knee Scoring System. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 470(1):3-19. PMC: 3237971. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2135-0. View