» Articles » PMID: 22064847

Hearing Preservation Surgery in Acoustic Neuroma. Slow Progress and New Strategies

Overview
Date 2011 Nov 9
PMID 22064847
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Quality and rate of preserved hearing are crucial to make hearing preservation surgery a viable treatment. A long-term experience with hearing preservation surgery, with tumour size and hearing as admission criteria, was evaluated to assess which size and hearing allowed a high rate of success. The hearing outcome in relation to size of tumour and pre-operative hearing was retrospectively reviewed in a consecutive series of 115 cases of sporadic acoustic neuroma which were operated on with hearing preservation surgery. Inclusion criteria were hearing with ≤ 30 dB pure tone average and ≥ 70% Speech Discrimination Score. The size was ≤ 15 mm in the first series of 51 cases, and ≤ 10 mm in the second series of 64 cases. Pre-operative and post-operative pure tone average were measured at 0.5 to 4.0 KHz, and speech discrimination score at ≤ 40 dB above perception. Post-operative hearing within 30 dB pure tone average and 70% speech discrimination score was considered socially useful hearing and successful outcome. The change to 40 dB pure tone average and 60% speech discrimination score from a pre-operative 30 pure tone average/70% speech discrimination score was considered an acceptable outcome. Patients with a tumour of ≤ 10 mm size in the cerebello-pontine-angle and hearing within 20 dB pure tone average/80% speech discrimination score had a success rate of 76%. Patients with hearing between the 20 dB pure tone average/80% speech discrimination score and 30 dB pure tone average/ 70% speech discrimination score had a success rate of 41%, which increased to 53% if the limit to success was set at 40 dB pure tone average/60% speech discrimination score. Patients with a tumour larger than 10 mm or hearing worse than 30 dB pure tone average/70% speech discrimination score had a poor preservation rate. In conclusion, hearing preservation surgery on a ≤ 10 mm acoustic neuroma with good hearing had a high rate of success and appeared to be a realistic treatment option which could be integrated with observation and radiotherapy in updated guidelines of treatment.

Citing Articles

Prognostic Factors for Hearing Preservation Surgery in Small Vestibular Schwannoma.

Concheri S, Deretti A, Tealdo G, Zanoletti E Audiol Res. 2023; 13(4):473-483.

PMID: 37489378 PMC: 10366768. DOI: 10.3390/audiolres13040042.


Candidacy for Cochlear implantation: Validating a novel Cochlear implant candidacy calculator against gold-standard, in-clinic audiometric assessments.

So R, Padova D, Bowditch S, Agrawal Y Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022; 7(3):835-839.

PMID: 35734067 PMC: 9195020. DOI: 10.1002/lio2.804.


Understanding the Molecular Mechanism of Vestibular Schwannoma for Hearing Preservation Surgery: Otologists' Perspective from Bedside to Bench.

Hosoya M, Wakabayashi T, Wasano K, Nishiyama T, Tsuzuki N, Oishi N Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(5).

PMID: 35626200 PMC: 9140016. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051044.


Twelve-year results of LINAC-based radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas.

Anselmo P, Casale M, Arcidiacono F, Trippa F, Rispoli R, Draghini L Strahlenther Onkol. 2019; 196(1):40-47.

PMID: 31384957 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-019-01498-7.


Surgery of the lateral skull base: a 50-year endeavour.

Zanoletti E, Mazzoni A, Martini A, Abbritti R, Albertini R, Alexandre E Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2019; 39(SUPPL. 1):S1-S146.

PMID: 31130732 PMC: 6540636. DOI: 10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-39-2019.


References
1.
Kanzaki J, Tos M, Sanna M, Moffat D, Monsell E, Berliner K . New and modified reporting systems from the consensus meeting on systems for reporting results in vestibular schwannoma. Otol Neurotol. 2003; 24(4):642-8; discussion 648-9. DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200307000-00019. View

2.
Mazzoni A, Calabrese V, Danesi G . A modified retrosigmoid approach for direct exposure of the fundus of the internal auditory canal for hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery. Am J Otol. 2000; 21(1):98-109. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0709(00)80082-4. View

3.
Mick P, Westerberg B, Ngo R, Akagami R . Growing vestibular schwannomas: what happens next?. Otol Neurotol. 2008; 30(1):101-4. DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e31818f57c5. View

4.
Stangerup S, Thomsen J, Tos M, Caye-Thomasen P . Long-term hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma. Otol Neurotol. 2009; 31(2):271-5. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181c34bda. View

5.
Sanna M, Khrais T, Russo A, Piccirillo E, Augurio A . Hearing preservation surgery in vestibular schwannoma: the hidden truth. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2004; 113(2):156-63. DOI: 10.1177/000348940411300215. View