» Articles » PMID: 22058274

A Dynamical Systems Analysis of Afferent Control in a Neuromechanical Model of Locomotion: I. Rhythm Generation

Overview
Journal J Neural Eng
Date 2011 Nov 8
PMID 22058274
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Locomotion in mammals is controlled by a spinal central pattern generator (CPG) coupled to a biomechanical limb system, with afferent feedback to the spinal circuits and CPG closing the control loop. We have considered a simplified model of this system, in which the CPG establishes a rhythm when a supra-spinal activating drive is present and afferent signals from a single-joint limb feed back to affect CPG operation. Using dynamical system methods, in a series of two papers we analyze the mechanisms by which this model produces oscillations, and the characteristics of these oscillations, in the closed- and open-loop regimes. In this first paper, we analyze the phase transition mechanisms operating within the CPG and use the results to explain how afferent feedback allows oscillations to occur at a wider range of drive values to the CPG than the range over which oscillations occur in the CPG without feedback, and then to comment on why stronger feedback leads to faster oscillations. Linking these transitions to structures in the phase plane associated with the limb segment clarifies how increased weights of afferent feedback to the CPG can restore locomotion after removal of supra-spinal drive to simulate spinal cord injury.

Citing Articles

Variational analysis of sensory feedback mechanisms in powerstroke-recovery systems.

Yu Z, Thomas P Biol Cybern. 2024; 118(5-6):277-309.

PMID: 39249120 PMC: 11588830. DOI: 10.1007/s00422-024-00996-x.


Tutorial: using NEURON for neuromechanical simulations.

Fietkiewicz C, McDougal R, Corrales Marco D, Chiel H, Thomas P Front Comput Neurosci. 2023; 17:1143323.

PMID: 37583894 PMC: 10424731. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2023.1143323.


Shape versus timing: linear responses of a limit cycle with hard boundaries under instantaneous and static perturbation.

Wang Y, Gill J, Chiel H, Thomas P SIAM J Appl Dyn Syst. 2023; 20(2):701-744.

PMID: 37207037 PMC: 10194846. DOI: 10.1137/20m1344974.


Biomechanical and Sensory Feedback Regularize the Behavior of Different Locomotor Central Pattern Generators.

Deng K, Hunt A, Szczecinski N, Tresch M, Chiel H, Heckman C Biomimetics (Basel). 2022; 7(4).

PMID: 36546926 PMC: 9776051. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics7040226.


Variational and phase response analysis for limit cycles with hard boundaries, with applications to neuromechanical control problems.

Wang Y, Gill J, Chiel H, Thomas P Biol Cybern. 2022; 116(5-6):687-710.

PMID: 36396795 PMC: 9691512. DOI: 10.1007/s00422-022-00951-8.


References
1.
Barbeau H, McCrea D, ODonovan M, Rossignol S, Grill W, Lemay M . Tapping into spinal circuits to restore motor function. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1999; 30(1):27-51. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0173(99)00008-9. View

2.
Daun S, Rubin J, Rybak I . Control of oscillation periods and phase durations in half-center central pattern generators: a comparative mechanistic analysis. J Comput Neurosci. 2009; 27(1):3-36. PMC: 2844522. DOI: 10.1007/s10827-008-0124-4. View

3.
Angel M, Jankowska E, McCrea D . Candidate interneurones mediating group I disynaptic EPSPs in extensor motoneurones during fictive locomotion in the cat. J Physiol. 2004; 563(Pt 2):597-610. PMC: 1665583. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.076034. View

4.
Prochazka A, Gorassini M . Models of ensemble firing of muscle spindle afferents recorded during normal locomotion in cats. J Physiol. 1998; 507 ( Pt 1):277-91. PMC: 2230775. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.277bu.x. View

5.
Hayes H, Chang Y, Hochman S . An in vitro spinal cord-hindlimb preparation for studying behaviorally relevant rat locomotor function. J Neurophysiol. 2008; 101(2):1114-22. PMC: 2657055. DOI: 10.1152/jn.90523.2008. View