An Online Resource of Digital Stories About Cancer Genetics: Qualitative Study of Patient Preferences and Information Needs

Overview

Journal J Med Internet Res

Publisher JMIR Publications

Specialty Medical Informatics

Date 2011 Nov 8

PMID 22057223

Citations 7

Authors

Rachel Iredale

Lisa Mundy

Jennifer Hilgart

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The Cancer Genetics Service for Wales (CGSW) was established in 1998 as an all-Wales service for individuals with concerns about their family history of cancer. CGSW offers a range of services such as risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing. Individuals referred to cancer genetics services often have unmet information and support needs, and they value access to practical and experiential information from other patients and health professionals. As a result of the lifelong nature of genetic conditions, a fundamental challenge is to meet the ongoing needs of these patients by providing easily accessible and reliable information.

Objectives: Our aims were to explore how the long-term information and support needs of CGSW patients could be met and to assess whether an online bank of digital stories about cancer genetics would be acceptable to patients.

Methods: In 2009, CGSW organized patient panels across Wales. During these events, 169 patients were asked for their feedback about a potential online resource of digital stories from CGSW patients and staff. A total of 75 patients registered to take part in the project and 23 people from across Wales agreed to share their story. All participants took part in a follow-up interview.

Results: Patient preferences for an online collection of cancer genetics stories were collected at the patient panels. Key topics to be covered by the stories were identified, and this feedback informed the development of the website to ensure that patients' needs would be met. The 23 patient storytellers were aged between 28 and 75 years, and 19 were female. The digital stories reflect patients' experiences within CGSW and the implications of living with or at risk of cancer. Follow-up interviews with patient storytellers showed that they shared their experiences as a means of helping other patients and to increase understanding of the cancer genetics service. Digital stories were also collected from 12 members of staff working at CGSW. The digital stories provide reliable and easily accessible information about cancer genetics and are hosted on the StoryBank website (www.cancergeneticsstorybank.co.uk).

Conclusions: The Internet is one mechanism through which the long-term information and support needs of cancer genetics patients can be met. The StoryBank is one of the first places where patient and staff stories have been allied to every aspect of a patient pathway through a service and provides patients with an experiential perspective of the cancer genetics "journey." The StoryBank was developed in direct response to patient feedback and is an innovative example of patient involvement in service development. The stories are a useful resource for newly referred patients, current patients, the general public, and health care professionals.

Citing Articles

Digital Storytelling in Older Adults With Typical Aging, and With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia: A Systematic Literature Review.

Rios Rincon A, Miguel Cruz A, Daum C, Neubauer N, Comeau A, Liu L J Appl Gerontol. 2021; 41(3):867-880.

PMID: 34009053 PMC: 8848055. DOI: 10.1177/07334648211015456.

The VOICES Typology of Curatorial Decisions in Narrative Collections of the Lived Experiences of Mental Health Service Use, Recovery, or Madness: Qualitative Study.

Yeo C, Hare-Duke L, Rennick-Egglestone S, Bradstreet S, Callard F, Hui A JMIR Ment Health. 2020; 7(9):e16290.

PMID: 32945771 PMC: 7532459. DOI: 10.2196/16290.

Psychosocial morbidity in TP53 mutation carriers: is whole-body cancer screening beneficial?.

McBride K, Ballinger M, Schlub T, Young M, Tattersall M, Kirk J Fam Cancer. 2017; 16(3):423-432.

PMID: 28124295 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-016-9964-7.

Voices of the "99 Percent": The Role of Online Narrative to Improve Health Care.

Sundstrom B, Meier S, Anderson M, Booth K, Cooper L, Flock E Perm J. 2016; 20(4):15-224.

PMID: 27455070 PMC: 5101090. DOI: 10.7812/TPP/15-224.

Educating Parents About Pediatric Research: Children and Clinical Studies Website Qualitative Evaluation.

Marceau L, Welch L, Pemberton V, Pearson G Qual Health Res. 2015; 26(8):1114-22.

PMID: 26711142 PMC: 5527330. DOI: 10.1177/1049732315616620.

References

McQueen A, Kreuter M . Women's cognitive and affective reactions to breast cancer survivor stories: a structural equation analysis. Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 81 Suppl:S15-21. PMC: 2993782. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.08.015. View

Hsieh H, Shannon S . Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15(9):1277-88. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687. View

Bernhardt J, Weaver Lariscy R, Parrott R, Silk K, Felter E . Perceived barriers to Internet-based health communication on human genetics. J Health Commun. 2002; 7(4):325-40. DOI: 10.1080/10810730290088166. View

Ziebland S . The importance of being expert: the quest for cancer information on the Internet. Soc Sci Med. 2004; 59(9):1783-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.019. View

Hughes L, Phelps C . "The bigger the network the bigger the bowl of cherries...": exploring the acceptability of, and preferences for, an ongoing support network for known BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutation carriers. J Genet Couns. 2010; 19(5):487-96. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-010-9300-6. View

Henderson B, Maguire B . Lay representations of genetic disease, and predictive testing. J Health Psychol. 2011; 3(2):233-41. DOI: 10.1177/135910539800300207. View

Crawford M, Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T, Bhui K, Fulop N . Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ. 2002; 325(7375):1263. PMC: 136920. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.325.7375.1263. View

Elwyn G, Iredale R, Gray J . Reactions of GPs to a triage-controlled referral system for cancer genetics. Fam Pract. 2002; 19(1):65-71. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/19.1.65. View

Fogel J, Albert S, Schnabel F, Ditkoff B, Neugut A . Internet use and social support in women with breast cancer. Health Psychol. 2002; 21(4):398-404. View

10.

Bender J, Jimenez-Marroquin M, Jadad A . Seeking support on facebook: a content analysis of breast cancer groups. J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13(1):e16. PMC: 3221337. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1560. View

11.

Metcalfe A, Werrett J, Burgess L, Chapman C, Clifford C . Cancer genetic predisposition: information needs of patients irrespective of risk level. Fam Cancer. 2009; 8(4):403-12. DOI: 10.1007/s10689-009-9256-6. View

12.

Phelps C, Wood F, Bennett P, Brain K, Gray J . Knowledge and expectations of women undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment: a qualitative analysis of free-text questionnaire comments. J Genet Couns. 2007; 16(4):505-14. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-007-9086-3. View

13.

Fogel J, Albert S, Schnabel F, Ditkoff B, Neugut A . Use of the Internet by women with breast cancer. J Med Internet Res. 2003; 4(2):E9. PMC: 1761930. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4.2.e9. View

14.

Eysenbach G, Kohler C . How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ. 2002; 324(7337):573-7. PMC: 78994. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.573. View

15.

Birru M, Monaco V, Charles L, Drew H, Njie V, Bierria T . Internet usage by low-literacy adults seeking health information: an observational analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2004; 6(3):e25. PMC: 1550604. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e25. View

16.

Kreuter M, Holmes K, Alcaraz K, Kalesan B, Rath S, Richert M . Comparing narrative and informational videos to increase mammography in low-income African American women. Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 81 Suppl:S6-14. PMC: 3146295. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.09.008. View

17.

Pieterse A, Ausems M, Van Dulmen A, Beemer F, Bensing J . Initial cancer genetic counseling consultation: change in counselees' cognitions and anxiety, and association with addressing their needs and preferences. Am J Med Genet A. 2005; 137(1):27-35. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30839. View

18.

Iredale R, Brain K, Gray J, France E . The information and support needs of women at high risk of familial breast and ovarian cancer: how can cancer genetic services give patients what they want?. Fam Cancer. 2003; 2(2):119-21. DOI: 10.1023/a:1025706907045. View

19.

Herxheimer A, McPherson A, Miller R, Shepperd S, Yaphe J, Ziebland S . Database of patients' experiences (DIPEx): a multi-media approach to sharing experiences and information. Lancet. 2000; 355(9214):1540-3. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02174-7. View

20.

Joseph G, Beattie M, Lee R, Braithwaite D, Wilcox C, Metrikin M . Pre-counseling education for low literacy women at risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC): patient experiences using the Cancer Risk Education Intervention Tool (CREdIT). J Genet Couns. 2010; 19(5):447-62. PMC: 2944955. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-010-9303-3. View