» Articles » PMID: 22046337

Role of the Primary Motor Cortex in the Early Boost in Performance Following Mental Imagery Training

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2011 Nov 3
PMID 22046337
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recently, it has been suggested that the primary motor cortex (M1) plays a critical role in implementing the fast and transient post-training phase of motor skill consolidation, known to yield an early boost in performance. Whether a comparable early boost in performance occurs following motor imagery (MIM) training is still unknown. To address this issue, two groups of subjects learned a finger tapping sequence either by MIM or physical practice (PP). In both groups, performance increased significantly in the post-training phase when compared with the pre-training phase and further increased after a 30 min resting period, indicating that both MIM and PP trainings were equally efficient and induced an early boost in motor performance. This conclusion was corroborated by the results of an additional control group. In a second experiment, we then investigated the causal role of M1 in implementing the early boost process resulting from MIM training. To do so, we inhibited M1 by applying a continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) in healthy volunteers just after they learnt, by MIM, the same finger-tapping task as in Experiment #1. As a control, cTBS was applied over the vertex of subjects who underwent the same experiment. We found that cTBS applied over M1 selectively abolished the early boost process subsequent to MIM training. Altogether, the present study provides evidence that MIM practice induces an early boost in performance and demonstrates that M1 is causally involved in this process. These findings further divulge some degree of behavioral and neuronal similitude between MIM and PP.

Citing Articles

Active and Passive Offline Breaks Differentially Impact the Consolidation of Procedural Motor Memories in Children and Adults.

Voisin D, Peigneux P, Urbain C Brain Behav. 2024; 14(11):e70138.

PMID: 39551949 PMC: 11570425. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70138.


Structural and functional features characterizing the brains of individuals with higher controllability of motor imagery.

Furuta T, Morita T, Miura G, Naito E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):17243.

PMID: 39060339 PMC: 11282224. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-68425-4.


Sleep-related motor skill consolidation and generalizability after physical practice, motor imagery, and action observation.

Conessa A, Debarnot U, Siegler I, Boutin A iScience. 2023; 26(8):107314.

PMID: 37520714 PMC: 10374463. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107314.


Anodal tDCS does not enhance the learning of the sequential finger-tapping task by motor imagery practice in healthy older adults.

Metais A, Muller C, Boublay N, Breuil C, Guillot A, Daligault S Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 14:1060791.

PMID: 36570544 PMC: 9780548. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.1060791.


Dissipation of reactive inhibition is sufficient to explain post-rest improvements in motor sequence learning.

Gupta M, Rickard T NPJ Sci Learn. 2022; 7(1):25.

PMID: 36202812 PMC: 9537514. DOI: 10.1038/s41539-022-00140-z.


References
1.
Nader K . Memory traces unbound. Trends Neurosci. 2003; 26(2):65-72. DOI: 10.1016/S0166-2236(02)00042-5. View

2.
Wohldmann E, Healy A, Bourne Jr L . Pushing the limits of imagination: mental practice for learning sequences. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007; 33(1):254-61. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.254. View

3.
Guillot A, Collet C, Nguyen V, Malouin F, Richards C, Doyon J . Functional neuroanatomical networks associated with expertise in motor imagery. Neuroimage. 2008; 41(4):1471-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.042. View

4.
Hotermans C, Peigneux P, de Noordhout A, Moonen G, Maquet P . Early boost and slow consolidation in motor skill learning. Learn Mem. 2006; 13(5):580-3. DOI: 10.1101/lm.239406. View

5.
Karni A . When practice makes perfect. Lancet. 1995; 345(8946):395. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90386-0. View