» Articles » PMID: 22043096

Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Patterns Among American Indian Women at IHS Clinics in Montana and Wyoming

Abstract

Objectives: We investigated factors associated with primary and secondary breast and cervical cancer screening among American Indian (AI) women receiving care from the Indian Health Service (IHS) in Montana and Wyoming.

Methods: Rates of primary screening (i.e., screening without evidence of a prior abnormal) and secondary screening during a three-year period (2004-2006) were determined in an age- and clinic-stratified random sample of 1,094 women at six IHS units through medical record review.

Results: Three-year mammography prevalence rates among AI women aged ≥45 years were 37.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 34.1, 41.3) for primary and 58.7% (95% CI 43.9, 73.5) for secondary screening. Among women aged ≥18 years, three-year Pap test prevalence rates were 37.8% (95% CI 34.9, 40.6) for primary and 53.2% (95% CI 46.0, 60.4) for secondary screening. Primary mammography screening was positively associated with number of visits and receiving care at an IHS hospital (both p<0.001). Primary Pap test screening was inversely associated with age and positively associated with the number of patient visits (both p<0.001). Secondary mammography screening was inversely associated with driving distance to an IHS facility (p=0.035).

Conclusion: Our results are consistent with other surveys among AI women, which report that Healthy People 2010 goals for breast (90%) and cervical (70%) cancer screening have not been met. Improvements in breast and cervical cancer screening among AI women attending IHS facilities are needed.

Citing Articles

Medicaid expansions and differences in guideline-adherent cervical cancer screening between American Indian and White women.

Gartner D, Islam J, Margerison C Cancer Med. 2023; 12(7):8700-8709.

PMID: 36629351 PMC: 10134301. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5593.


Patient and physician characteristics affect adherence to screening mammography: A population-based cohort study.

Katz D, Tengekyon A, Kahan N, Calderon-Margalit R PLoS One. 2018; 13(3):e0194409.

PMID: 29584742 PMC: 5870964. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194409.


Barriers of Female Breast, Colorectal, and Cervical Cancer Screening Among American Indians-Where to Intervene?.

Lin Y, Gong X, Mousseau R AIMS Public Health. 2018; 3(4):891-906.

PMID: 29546202 PMC: 5690412. DOI: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.4.891.


Mammography rates for breast cancer screening: a comparison of First Nations women and all other women living in Manitoba, Canada, 1999-2008.

Demers A, Decker K, Kliewer E, Musto G, Shu E, Biswanger N Prev Chronic Dis. 2015; 12:E82.

PMID: 26020546 PMC: 4454407. DOI: 10.5888/pcd12.140571.

References
1.
DuBard C, Yow A, Bostrom S, Attiah E, Griffith B, Lawrence W . Racial/ethnic differences in quality of care for North Carolina Medicaid recipients. N C Med J. 2009; 70(2):96-101. View

2.
Benard V, Lawson H, Eheman C, Anderson C, Helsel W . Adherence to guidelines for follow-up of low-grade cytologic abnormalities among medically underserved women. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 105(6):1323-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000159549.56601.75. View

3.
Pandhi N, Guadagnolo B, Kanekar S, Petereit D, Smith M . Cancer screening in Native Americans from the Northern Plains. Am J Prev Med. 2010; 38(4):389-95. PMC: 2851544. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.12.027. View

4.
Abdel-Malek N, Chiarelli A, Sloan M, Stewart D, Mai V, Howlett R . Influence of physician and patient characteristics on adherence to breast cancer screening recommendations. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2007; 17(1):48-53. DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32809b4cef. View

5.
Mobley L, Kuo T, Clayton L, Evans W . Mammography facilities are accessible, so why is utilization so low?. Cancer Causes Control. 2009; 20(6):1017-28. PMC: 2694850. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-009-9295-1. View