» Articles » PMID: 22039425

BRAF Mutations in Advanced Cancers: Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2011 Nov 1
PMID 22039425
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Oncogenic BRAF mutations have been found in diverse malignancies and activate RAF/MEK/ERK signaling, a critical pathway of tumorigenesis. We examined the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with mutant (mut) BRAF advanced cancer referred to phase 1 clinic.

Methods: We reviewed the records of 80 consecutive patients with mutBRAF advanced malignancies and 149 with wild-type (wt) BRAF (matched by tumor type) referred to the Clinical Center for Targeted Therapy and analyzed their outcome.

Results: Of 80 patients with mutBRAF advanced cancer, 56 had melanoma, 10 colorectal, 11 papillary thyroid, 2 ovarian and 1 esophageal cancer. Mutations in codon 600 were found in 77 patients (62, V600E; 13, V600K; 1, V600R; 1, unreported). Multivariate analysis showed less soft tissue (Odds ratio (OR) = 0.39, 95%CI: 0.20-0.77, P = 0.007), lung (OR = 0.38, 95%CI: 0.19-0.73, p = 0.004) and retroperitoneal metastases (OR = 0.34, 95%CI: 0.13-0.86, p = 0.024) and more brain metastases (OR = 2.05, 95%CI: 1.02-4.11, P = 0.043) in patients with mutBRAF versus wtBRAF. Comparing to the corresponding wtBRAF, mutBRAF melanoma patients had insignificant trend to longer median survival from diagnosis (131 vs. 78 months, p = 0.14), while mutBRAF colorectal cancer patients had an insignificant trend to shorter median survival from diagnosis (48 vs. 53 months, p = 0.22). In melanoma, V600K mutations in comparison to other BRAF mutations were associated with more frequent brain (75% vs. 36.3%, p = 0.02) and lung metastases (91.6% vs. 47.7%, p = 0.007), and shorter time from diagnosis to metastasis and to death (19 vs. 53 months, p = 0.046 and 78 vs. 322 months, p = 0.024 respectively). Treatment with RAF/MEK targeting agents (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.16, 95%CI: 0.03-0.89, p = 0.037) and any decrease in tumor size after referral (HR = 0.07, 95%CI: 0.015-0.35, p = 0.001) correlated with longer survival in mutBRAF patients.

Conclusions: BRAF appears to be a druggable mutation that also defines subgroups of patients with phenotypic overlap, albeit with differences that correlate with histology or site of mutation.

Citing Articles

Molecular Underpinnings of Brain Metastases.

Jacome M, Wu Q, Chen J, Mohamed Z, Mokhtari S, Pina Y Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(5).

PMID: 40076927 PMC: 11900073. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26052307.


An Optimized CRISPR/Cas12a Assay to Facilitate the BRAF V600E Mutation Detection.

Etemadzadeh A, Salehipour P, Motlagh F, Khalifeh M, Asadbeigi A, Tabrizi M J Clin Lab Anal. 2024; 38(21):e25101.

PMID: 39445676 PMC: 11555610. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.25101.


Prognostic Value of Baseline F-FDG PET/CT to Predict Brain Metastasis Development in Melanoma Patients.

Kalantari F, Mirshahvalad S, Hoellwerth M, Schweighofer-Zwink G, Huber-Schonauer U, Hitzl W Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(1).

PMID: 38201554 PMC: 10778001. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010127.


Targeted molecular profiling of solid tumours-Indian tertiary cancer centre experience.

Gurav M, Epari S, Gogte P, Pai T, Deshpande G, Karnik N J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023; 149(10):7413-7425.

PMID: 36935431 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04693-3.


Leveraging Molecular and Immune-Based Therapies in Leptomeningeal Metastases.

Wilcox J, Boire A CNS Drugs. 2022; 37(1):45-67.

PMID: 36474108 PMC: 9829628. DOI: 10.1007/s40263-022-00975-5.


References
1.
Greenman C, Stephens P, Smith R, Dalgliesh G, Hunter C, Bignell G . Patterns of somatic mutation in human cancer genomes. Nature. 2007; 446(7132):153-8. PMC: 2712719. DOI: 10.1038/nature05610. View

2.
Flaherty K, Puzanov I, Kim K, Ribas A, McArthur G, Sosman J . Inhibition of mutated, activated BRAF in metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(9):809-19. PMC: 3724529. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002011. View

3.
Saridaki Z, Papadatos-Pastos D, Tzardi M, Mavroudis D, Bairaktari E, Arvanity H . BRAF mutations, microsatellite instability status and cyclin D1 expression predict metastatic colorectal patients' outcome. Br J Cancer. 2010; 102(12):1762-8. PMC: 2883698. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605694. View

4.
Eberhard D, Johnson B, Amler L, Goddard A, Heldens S, Herbst R . Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor and in KRAS are predictive and prognostic indicators in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy alone and in combination with erlotinib. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(25):5900-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.857. View

5.
Kumar R, Angelini S, Czene K, Sauroja I, Hahka-Kemppinen M, Pyrhonen S . BRAF mutations in metastatic melanoma: a possible association with clinical outcome. Clin Cancer Res. 2003; 9(9):3362-8. View