Predictive Models for Subtypes of Autism Spectrum Disorder Based on Single-nucleotide Polymorphisms and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Overview
Affiliations
Purpose: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder, of which Asperger syndrome and high-functioning autism are subtypes. Our goal is: 1) to determine whether a diagnostic model based on single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), brain regional thickness measurements, or brain regional volume measurements can distinguish Asperger syndrome from high-functioning autism; and 2) to compare the SNP, thickness, and volume-based diagnostic models.
Material And Methods: Our study included 18 children with ASD: 13 subjects with high-functioning autism and 5 subjects with Asperger syndrome. For each child, we obtained 25 SNPs for 8 ASD-related genes; we also computed regional cortical thicknesses and volumes for 66 brain structures, based on structural magnetic resonance (MR) examination. To generate diagnostic models, we employed five machine-learning techniques: decision stump, alternating decision trees, multi-class alternating decision trees, logistic model trees, and support vector machines.
Results: For SNP-based classification, three decision-tree-based models performed better than the other two machine-learning models. The performance metrics for three decision-tree-based models were similar: decision stump was modestly better than the other two methods, with accuracy = 90%, sensitivity = 0.95 and specificity = 0.75. All thickness and volume-based diagnostic models performed poorly. The SNP-based diagnostic models were superior to those based on thickness and volume. For SNP-based classification, rs878960 in GABRB3 (gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptor, beta 3) was selected by all tree-based models.
Conclusion: Our analysis demonstrated that SNP-based classification was more accurate than morphometry-based classification in ASD subtype classification. Also, we found that one SNP--rs878960 in GABRB3--distinguishes Asperger syndrome from high-functioning autism.
Moridian P, Ghassemi N, Jafari M, Salloum-Asfar S, Sadeghi D, Khodatars M Front Mol Neurosci. 2022; 15:999605.
PMID: 36267703 PMC: 9577321. DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.999605.
Song C, Jiang Z, Liu D, Wu L Front Psychiatry. 2022; 13:960672.
PMID: 36090350 PMC: 9449316. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.960672.
Multivariate analyses applied to fetal, neonatal and pediatric MRI of neurodevelopmental disorders.
Levman J, Takahashi E Neuroimage Clin. 2015; 9:532-44.
PMID: 26640765 PMC: 4625213. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.09.017.
Libero L, DeRamus T, Lahti A, Deshpande G, Kana R Cortex. 2015; 66:46-59.
PMID: 25797658 PMC: 4782775. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.02.008.
Common EIF4E variants modulate risk for autism spectrum disorders in the high-functioning range.
Waltes R, Gfesser J, Haslinger D, Schneider-Momm K, Biscaldi M, Voran A J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2014; 121(9):1107-16.
PMID: 24818597 DOI: 10.1007/s00702-014-1230-2.