» Articles » PMID: 22031899

Spatiotemporal Variation of Multiple Neurophysiological Signals in the Primary Motor Cortex During Dexterous Reach-to-grasp Movements

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2011 Oct 28
PMID 22031899
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To examine the spatiotemporal distribution of discriminable information about reach-to-grasp movements in the primary motor cortex upper extremity representation, we implanted four microelectrode arrays in the anterior bank and lip of the central sulcus in each of two monkeys. We used linear discriminant analysis to compare information, quantified as decoding accuracy, contained in various neurophysiological signals. For all signal types, decoding accuracy increased immediately after the movement cue, peaked around movement onset, and declined during the static hold. Spike recordings and local field potential (LFP) time domain amplitude provided more discriminable information than LFP frequency domain power. Discriminable information on movement type was distributed evenly across recording sites by LFP amplitude and 1-4 Hz power but unevenly by 100-170 Hz power and spike recordings. These latter two signal types provided higher decoding accuracies closer to the hemispheric surface than deep in the anterior bank and also provided accuracies that varied along the central sulcus. This variation in the distribution of movement-type information may be related to differences in the rostral versus caudal regions of the primary motor cortex and to its underlying somatotopic organization. The even distribution of information by LFP amplitude and 1-4 Hz power compared with the more localized distribution by 100-170 Hz power and spikes suggest that these different neurophysiological signals reflect different underlying processes that distribute information through the motor cortex during reach-to-grasp movements.

Citing Articles

Initial and corrective submovement encoding differences within primary motor cortex during precision reaching.

Schwartze K, Lee W, Rouse A J Neurophysiol. 2024; 132(2):433-445.

PMID: 38985937 PMC: 11427045. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00269.2023.


Identifying Distinct Neural Features between the Initial and Corrective Phases of Precise Reaching Using AutoLFADS.

Lee W, Karpowicz B, Pandarinath C, Rouse A J Neurosci. 2024; 44(20).

PMID: 38538142 PMC: 11097258. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1224-23.2024.


Theoretical considerations and supporting evidence for the primary role of source geometry on field potential amplitude and spatial extent.

Herreras O, Torres D, Makarov V, Makarova J Front Cell Neurosci. 2023; 17:1129097.

PMID: 37066073 PMC: 10097999. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1129097.


Emergent Low-Frequency Activity in Cortico-Cerebellar Networks with Motor Skill Learning.

Fleischer P, Abbasi A, Fealy A, Danielsen N, Sandhu R, Raj P eNeuro. 2023; 10(2).

PMID: 36750360 PMC: 9946068. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0011-23.2023.


Cortico-cortical drive in a coupled premotor-primary motor cortex dynamical system.

DAleo R, Rouse A, Schieber M, Sarma S Cell Rep. 2022; 41(12):111849.

PMID: 36543147 PMC: 11271678. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111849.


References
1.
Theverapperuma L, Hendrix C, Mason C, Ebner T . Finger movements during reach-to-grasp in the monkey: amplitude scaling of a temporal synergy. Exp Brain Res. 2005; 169(4):433-48. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0167-y. View

2.
Strick P, PRESTON J . Two representations of the hand in area 4 of a primate. II. Somatosensory input organization. J Neurophysiol. 1982; 48(1):150-9. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1982.48.1.150. View

3.
Bansal A, Vargas-Irwin C, Truccolo W, Donoghue J . Relationships among low-frequency local field potentials, spiking activity, and three-dimensional reach and grasp kinematics in primary motor and ventral premotor cortices. J Neurophysiol. 2011; 105(4):1603-19. PMC: 3075284. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00532.2010. View

4.
Asher I, Stark E, Abeles M, Prut Y . Comparison of direction and object selectivity of local field potentials and single units in macaque posterior parietal cortex during prehension. J Neurophysiol. 2007; 97(5):3684-95. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00886.2006. View

5.
Lemon R . Functional properties of monkey motor cortex neurones receiving afferent input from the hand and fingers. J Physiol. 1981; 311:497-519. PMC: 1275426. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013601. View