» Articles » PMID: 22024545

Multisensory Integration Across the Senses in Young and Old Adults

Overview
Journal Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2011 Oct 26
PMID 22024545
Citations 54
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Stimuli are processed concurrently and across multiple sensory inputs. Here we directly compared the effect of multisensory integration (MSI) on reaction time across three paired sensory inputs in eighteen young (M=19.17 years) and eighteen old (M=76.44 years) individuals. Participants were determined to be non-demented and without any medical or psychiatric conditions that would affect their performance. Participants responded to randomly presented unisensory (auditory, visual, somatosensory) stimuli and three paired sensory inputs consisting of auditory-somatosensory (AS) auditory-visual (AV) and visual-somatosensory (VS) stimuli. Results revealed that reaction time (RT) to all multisensory pairings was significantly faster than those elicited to the constituent unisensory conditions across age groups; findings that could not be accounted for by simple probability summation. Both young and old participants responded the fastest to multisensory pairings containing somatosensory input. Compared to younger adults, older adults demonstrated a significantly greater RT benefit when processing concurrent VS information. In terms of co-activation, older adults demonstrated a significant increase in the magnitude of visual-somatosensory co-activation (i.e., multisensory integration), while younger adults demonstrated a significant increase in the magnitude of auditory-visual and auditory-somatosensory co-activation. This study provides first evidence in support of the facilitative effect of pairing somatosensory with visual stimuli in older adults.

Citing Articles

A drift diffusion model analysis of age-related impact on multisensory decision-making processes.

Bolam J, Diaz J, Andrews M, Coats R, Philiastides M, Astill S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):14895.

PMID: 38942761 PMC: 11213863. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65549-5.


Linking Dementia Pathology and Alteration in Brain Activation to Complex Daily Functional Decline During the Preclinical Dementia Stages: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

De Sanctis P, Mahoney J, Wagner J, Blumen H, Mowrey W, Ayers E JMIR Res Protoc. 2024; 13:e56726.

PMID: 38842914 PMC: 11190628. DOI: 10.2196/56726.


Multisensory integration augmenting motor processes among older adults.

Zou Z, Zhao B, Ting K, Wong C, Hou X, Chan C Front Aging Neurosci. 2024; 15:1293479.

PMID: 38192281 PMC: 10773807. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1293479.


Sex Differences in Low-Level Multisensory Integration in Developmental Dyslexia.

Glica A, Wasilewska K, Kossowski B, Zygierewicz J, Jednorog K J Neurosci. 2023; 44(3).

PMID: 38050156 PMC: 10860626. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0944-23.2023.


Virtual reality as a tool to explore multisensory processing before and after engagement in physical activity.

Basharat A, Mehrabi S, Munoz J, Middleton L, Cao S, Boger J Front Aging Neurosci. 2023; 15:1207651.

PMID: 38020766 PMC: 10652573. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1207651.


References
1.
Camicioli R, Panzer V, Kaye J . Balance in the healthy elderly: posturography and clinical assessment. Arch Neurol. 1997; 54(8):976-81. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1997.00550200040008. View

2.
Meredith M, Stein B . Spatial determinants of multisensory integration in cat superior colliculus neurons. J Neurophysiol. 1996; 75(5):1843-57. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1996.75.5.1843. View

3.
Erber N . Auditory, visual, and auditory-visual recognition of consonants by children with normal and impaired hearing. J Speech Hear Res. 1972; 15(2):413-22. DOI: 10.1044/jshr.1502.413. View

4.
Yesavage J, Brink T, Rose T, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M . Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1982; 17(1):37-49. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4. View

5.
Diederich A, Colonius H . Bimodal and trimodal multisensory enhancement: effects of stimulus onset and intensity on reaction time. Percept Psychophys. 2005; 66(8):1388-404. DOI: 10.3758/bf03195006. View