» Articles » PMID: 22022125

A Comparative Study of Slow and Fast Suryanamaskar on Physiological Function

Overview
Journal Int J Yoga
Date 2011 Oct 25
PMID 22022125
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Numerous scientific studies have reported beneficial physiological changes after short- and long-term yoga training. Suryanamaskar (SN) is an integral part of modern yoga training and may be performed either in a slow or rapid manner. As there are few studies on SN, we conducted this study to determine the differential effect of 6 months training in the fast and slow versions.

Materials And Methods: 42 school children in the age group of 12-16 years were randomly divided into two groups of 21 each. Group I and Group II received 6 months training in performance of slow suryanamaskar (SSN) and fast suryanamaskar (FSN), respectively.

Results: Training in SSN produced a significant decrease in diastolic pressure. In contrast, training in FSN produced a significant increase in systolic pressure. Although there was a highly significant increase in isometric hand grip (IHG) strength and hand grip endurance (HGE) in both the groups, the increase in HGE in FSN group was significantly more than in SSN group. Pulmonary function tests showed improvements in both the groups though intergroup comparison showed no significance difference. Maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximum expiratory pressure increased significantly in both the groups with increase of MIP in FSN group being more significant than in SSN.

Conclusion: The present study reports that SN has positive physiological benefits as evidenced by improvement of pulmonary function, respiratory pressures, hand grip strength and endurance, and resting cardiovascular parameters. It also demonstrates the differences between SN training when performed in a slow and fast manner, concluding that the effects of FSN are similar to physical aerobic exercises, whereas the effects of SSN are similar to those of yoga training.

Citing Articles

Yoga Module Development and Validation for Sickle Cell Disease.

Zaidi S, Mithila M, Mavathur R, Nagarathna R, Thulasi A, Ramsahaye A Int J Yoga. 2024; 16(3):219-225.

PMID: 38463648 PMC: 10919411. DOI: 10.4103/ijoy.ijoy_169_23.


Role of Yoga in Minimizing Stress and Anxiety in Women Experiencing Dysmenorrhea.

Chhikara A, Jain M, Vats S, Kashoo F, Chahal A, Guliya S J Lifestyle Med. 2023; 13(2):90-96.

PMID: 37970322 PMC: 10630717. DOI: 10.15280/jlm.2023.13.2.90.


Body Loading during an Intensive Yoga Exercise Routine and a Cycle Ergometer Test.

Stec K, Pilis K, Pilis W, Miodek P, Pilis A, Letkiewicz S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(5).

PMID: 36901166 PMC: 10001802. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20054157.


Surya Namaskar: As an Alternative for Aerobic Fitness.

Bandyopadhyay A, Halder K, Pathak A, Kumar B, Saha M Int J Yoga. 2022; 15(2):163-167.

PMID: 36329767 PMC: 9623894. DOI: 10.4103/ijoy.ijoy_8_22.


Exploration of Muscle Activity Using Surface Electromyography While Performing Surya Namaskar.

Mullerpatan R, Agarwal B, Shetty T Int J Yoga. 2020; 13(2):137-143.

PMID: 32669768 PMC: 7336940. DOI: 10.4103/ijoy.IJOY_72_19.


References
1.
Raghuraj P, Telles S . Muscle power, dexterity skill and visual perception in community home girls trained in yoga or sports and in regular school girls. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1999; 41(4):409-15. View

2.
Udupa K, Singh R, Settiwar R . Physiological and biochemical studies on the effect of yogic and certain other exercises. Indian J Med Res. 1975; 63(4):620-4. View

3.
Chen H, Kuo C . Relationship between respiratory muscle function and age, sex, and other factors. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1989; 66(2):943-8. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1989.66.2.943. View

4.
Sinha B, Ray U, Pathak A, Selvamurthy W . Energy cost and cardiorespiratory changes during the practice of Surya Namaskar. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2004; 48(2):184-90. View

5.
Selvamurthy W, Sridharan K, Ray U, Tiwary R, Hegde K, Radhakrishan U . A new physiological approach to control essential hypertension. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1999; 42(2):205-13. View