» Articles » PMID: 22021013

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Overview
Date 2011 Oct 25
PMID 22021013
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The reverse shoulder arthroplasty emerged as a potential solution for those patients who could not be managed effectively with a conventional total shoulder arthroplasty. Grammont revolutionized the design by medializing and distalizing the center of rotation and utilizing a large convex glenoid surface and concave humeral component with a neck-shaft angle of 155°. This design has been highly successful in cuff deficient shoulders, and indications continue to broaden. Many mid-term studies have improved upon the early encouraging results. Long-term studies are starting to emerge, demonstrating good survivorship, but progressive functional and radiographic deterioration continue to be concerning. Careful patient selection and attention to appropriate technique are required to reduce the current high rate of complications. New prosthesis designs are continuing to develop to address some of these limitations.

Citing Articles

Survivorship analysis of CAD-CAM total shoulder replacement.

Nayar S, Butt D, Prinja A, Rudge W, Majed A, Higgs D Shoulder Elbow. 2024; 16(4):390-396.

PMID: 39318417 PMC: 11418713. DOI: 10.1177/17585732231193285.


Pre-operative planning for reverse shoulder arthroplasty in low-resource centres: A modified Delphi study in South Africa.

Rachuene P, Dey R, Kauta N, Sivarasu S, du Plessis J, Roche S SICOT J. 2024; 10:23.

PMID: 38819293 PMC: 11141516. DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2024021.


Evaluation of online video content related to reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a YouTube-based study.

Fares M, Koa J, Boufadel P, Singh J, Vadhera A, Abboud J Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023; 26(2):162-168.

PMID: 37316177 PMC: 10277715. DOI: 10.5397/cise.2022.01452.


The most influential studies concerning revision shoulder arthroplasty research.

Syros A, Perez O, Luxenburg D, Cohen J, Swonger R, Huntley S J Orthop. 2022; 34:349-356.

PMID: 36238961 PMC: 9550591. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.09.019.


The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus <155°—A Systematic Review.

Longo U, Gulotta L, De Salvatore S, Berton A, Piergentili I, Bandini B J Clin Med. 2022; 11(13).

PMID: 35806927 PMC: 9267919. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11133641.


References
1.
Linscheid R, Colfield R . Total shoulder arthroplasty: experimental but promising. Geriatrics. 1976; 31(4):64-9. View

2.
Neer 2nd C . Displaced proximal humeral fractures. II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970; 52(6):1090-103. View

3.
Levigne C, Boileau P, Favard L, Garaud P, Mole D, Sirveaux F . Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008; 17(6):925-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.02.010. View

4.
Neer 2nd C . Replacement arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974; 56(1):1-13. View

5.
Nyffeler R, Werner C, Gerber C . Biomechanical relevance of glenoid component positioning in the reverse Delta III total shoulder prosthesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005; 14(5):524-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.010. View