» Articles » PMID: 22016670

Impact and User Satisfaction of a Clinical Information Portal Embedded in an Electronic Health Record

Overview
Date 2011 Oct 22
PMID 22016670
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In 2008, a clinical information tool was developed and embedded in the electronic health record system of an academic medical center. In 2009, the initial information tool, Clinical-e, was superseded by a portal called Clinical Focus, with a single search box enabling a federated search of selected online information resources. To measure the usefulness and impact of Clinical Focus, a survey was used to gather feedback about users' experience with this clinical resource. The survey determined what type of clinicians were using this tool and assessed user satisfaction and perceived impact on patient care decision making. Initial survey results suggest the majority of respondents found Clinical Focus easy to navigate, the content easy to read, and the retrieved information relevant and complete. The majority would recommend Clinical Focus to their colleagues. Results indicate that this tool is a promising area for future development.

Citing Articles

Embedding a Medical Search Engine Within an Electronic Health Record.

Alafaireet P, Belden J, Botkin M, Kochendorfer K, Kruse R, Strecker D Mo Med. 2018; 114(4):316-320.

PMID: 30228619 PMC: 6140091.


search.bioPreprint: a discovery tool for cutting edge, preprint biomedical research articles.

Iwema C, LaDue J, Zack A, Chattopadhyay A F1000Res. 2016; 5:1396.

PMID: 27508060 PMC: 4957174. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.8798.2.


Evaluating a federated medical search engine: tailoring the methodology and reporting the evaluation outcomes.

Saparova D, Belden J, Williams J, Richardson B, Schuster K Appl Clin Inform. 2014; 5(3):731-45.

PMID: 25298813 PMC: 4187090. DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2014-03-RA-0021.

References
1.
Epstein B, Tannery N, Wessel C, Yarger F, LaDue J, Fiorillo A . Development of a clinical information tool for the electronic medical record: a case study. J Med Libr Assoc. 2010; 98(3):223-7. PMC: 2900999. DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.98.3.010. View

2.
Humphreys B . Electronic health record meets digital library: a new environment for achieving an old goal. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000; 7(5):444-52. PMC: 79039. DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2000.0070444. View

3.
Sicotte C, Pare G, Moreault M, Lemay A, Valiquette L, Barkun J . Replacing an inpatient electronic medical record. Lessons learned from user satisfaction with the former system. Methods Inf Med. 2009; 48(1):92-100. View

4.
Krosnick J . Survey research. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004; 50:537-67. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.537. View

5.
Palm J, Colombet I, Sicotte C, Degoulet P . Determinants of user satisfaction with a Clinical Information System. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007; :614-8. PMC: 1839744. View