» Articles » PMID: 22016582

Comparator PH Study to Evaluate the Single-dose Pharmacodynamics of Dual Delayed-release Dexlansoprazole 60 Mg and Delayed-release Esomeprazole 40 Mg

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2011 Oct 22
PMID 22016582
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This paper describes a Phase 1, single-center, randomized, open-label, two-period crossover study which compared the pharmacodynamic effects of single doses of dexlansoprazole modified-release 60 mg and esomeprazole 40 mg on 24-hour intragastric pH in healthy adult subjects.

Methods: Forty-four subjects aged 20-54 years were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to two sequence groups defining the order in which they received dexlansoprazole and esomeprazole in periods 1 and 2. Primary pharmacodynamic end points over 24 hours postdose were percentage of time with intragastric pH > 4 and mean pH, and secondary pharmacodynamic end points were percentage of time intragastric pH > 4, and mean pH at 0-12 hours, and at >12-24 hours postdose. Each drug was given after an overnight fast and one hour before breakfast. Continuous pH recording began immediately before dosing through to 24 hours postdose.

Results: At 0-24 hours postdose, the mean percentage of time with pH > 4 for dexlansoprazole and esomeprazole was 58% and 48%, respectively; the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.003). The average of mean pH values at 0-24 hours postdose for dexlansoprazole and esomeprazole were 4.3 and 3.7, respectively; the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). At >12-24 hours postdose, mean percentage of time with pH > 4 and average of mean pH were greater for dexlansoprazole (60% and 4.5, respectively) compared with esomeprazole (42% and 3.5, respectively); the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001 for both intervals). At 0-12 hours postdose, the difference in dexlansoprazole and esomeprazole values for the pharmacodynamic end points was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: For the entire 24-hour postdose period, predominantly resulting from the >12-24-hour postdose interval, the average intragastric pH following a single dose of dexlansoprazole 60 mg was higher compared with that observed following a single dose of esomeprazole 40 mg, and the difference was statistically significant.

Citing Articles

Comparative Efficacy of Dexlansoprazole, Pantoprazole, Esomeprazole, and Rabeprazole in Achieving Optimal 24-Hour Intragastric pH Control: A Randomized Crossover Study Using Ambulatory pH Monitoring.

Jalihal U, Mahapatra J, Kumar A, Bharadwaj T, Singh H, Mehta V Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e71418.

PMID: 39539895 PMC: 11558283. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.71418.


Efficacy and safety of HIP1601 (dual delayed-release esomeprazole) 40 mg in erosive esophagitis compared to HGP1705 (delayed-release esomeprazole) 40 mg: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study.

Lim H, Park J, Chung H, Lee S, Park J, Park J BMC Gastroenterol. 2023; 23(1):447.

PMID: 38110901 PMC: 10729464. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-03087-6.


Comparison of Pharmacodynamics between Tegoprazan and Dexlansoprazole Regarding Nocturnal Acid Breakthrough: A Randomized Crossover Study.

Han S, Choi H, Kim Y, Choi S, Kim S, Nam J Gut Liver. 2022; 17(1):92-99.

PMID: 36317518 PMC: 9840922. DOI: 10.5009/gnl220050.


Comparative analysis of the effect of PO administered acid suppressants on gastric pH in healthy cats.

Ryan P, Odunayo A, Price J, Hecht S, Hillsman S, Galyon G J Vet Intern Med. 2020; 34(5):1879-1885.

PMID: 32885499 PMC: 7517516. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.15887.


A comparison between dexlansoprazole modified release-based and lansoprazole-based nonbismuth quadruple (concomitant) therapy for first-line eradication: a prospective randomized trial.

Tai W, Liang C, Bi K, Kuo C, Lu L, Wu C Infect Drug Resist. 2019; 12:2923-2931.

PMID: 31571945 PMC: 6754331. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S213998.


References
1.
Katz P, Ginsberg G, Hoyle P, Sostek M, Monyak J, Silberg D . Relationship between intragastric acid control and healing status in the treatment of moderate to severe erosive oesophagitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007; 25(5):617-28. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03235.x. View

2.
Junghard O, Hassan-Alin M, Hasselgren G . The effect of the area under the plasma concentration vs time curve and the maximum plasma concentration of esomeprazole on intragastric pH. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2002; 58(7):453-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00228-002-0502-1. View

3.
DeVault K, Talley N . Insights into the future of gastric acid suppression. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009; 6(9):524-32. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2009.125. View

4.
Warrington S, Baisley K, Dunn K, Boyce M, Morocutti A . Effects of single doses of rabeprazole 20 mg and esomeprazole 40 mg on 24-h intragastric pH in healthy subjects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2006; 62(9):685-91. DOI: 10.1007/s00228-006-0148-5. View

5.
Hassan-Alin M, Andersson T, Bredberg E, Rohss K . Pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole after oral and intravenous administration of single and repeated doses to healthy subjects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2001; 56(9-10):665-70. DOI: 10.1007/s002280000206. View