» Articles » PMID: 22013515

Carbohydrate Mouth Rinse Effects on Exercise Capacity in Pre- and Postprandial States

Overview
Journal J Nutr Metab
Publisher Wiley
Date 2011 Oct 21
PMID 22013515
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background. Oropharyngeal receptors signal presence of carbohydrate to the brain. Mouth rinses with a carbohydrate solution facilitate corticomotor output and improve time-trial performance in well-trained subjects in a fasted state. We tested for this effect in nonathletic subjects in fasted and nonfasted state. Methods. 13 healthy non-athletic males performed 5 tests on a cycle ergometer. After measuring maximum power output (Wmax), the subjects cycled four times at 60% Wmax until exhaustion while rinsing their mouth every 5 minutes with either a 6.4% maltodextrin solution or water, one time after an overnight fast and another after a carbohydrate rich breakfast. Results. Mouth rinsing with maltodextrin improved time-to-exhaustion in pre- and postprandial states. This was accompanied by reductions in the average and maximal rates of perceived exertion but no change in average or maximal heart rate was observed. Conclusions. Carbohydrate mouth rinsing improves endurance capacity in both fed and fasted states in non-athletic subjects.

Citing Articles

The Effects of a Carbohydrate Mouth Rinse on Soccer-Specific Skills Following a Morning High-Intensity Practice.

Bowling L, Scudamore E, Church J, Scudamore V Int J Exerc Sci. 2025; 18(6):215-224.

PMID: 40046238 PMC: 11881988. DOI: 10.70252/SJXT6980.


Carbohydrate mouth rinse failed to reduce central fatigue, lower perceived exertion, and improve performance during incremental exercise.

Pires F, Pinheiro F, Brietzke C, Franco-Alvarenga P, Veras K, de Matos E Front Nutr. 2024; 11:1329074.

PMID: 38445204 PMC: 10912157. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1329074.


Carbohydrate Oral Rinsing, Cycling Performance and Individual Complex Carbohydrate Taste Sensitivity.

Hartley C, Carr A, Roberts S, Bredie W, Keast R Nutrients. 2024; 16(3).

PMID: 38337743 PMC: 10857552. DOI: 10.3390/nu16030459.


Central effects of mouth rinses on endurance and strength performance.

Tan S, Khong T, Selvanayagam V, Yusof A Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023; 124(2):403-415.

PMID: 38038740 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-023-05350-w.


Mouth rinsing and ingesting salty or bitter solutions does not influence corticomotor excitability or neuromuscular function.

Gray E, Cavaleri R, Siegler J Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023; 123(6):1179-1189.

PMID: 36700971 PMC: 10191941. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-023-05141-3.


References
1.
Kringelbach M . Food for thought: hedonic experience beyond homeostasis in the human brain. Neuroscience. 2004; 126(4):807-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.04.035. View

2.
Moseley L, Lancaster G, Jeukendrup A . Effects of timing of pre-exercise ingestion of carbohydrate on subsequent metabolism and cycling performance. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003; 88(4-5):453-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-002-0728-8. View

3.
Sherman W, Costill D, Fink W, Miller J . Effect of exercise-diet manipulation on muscle glycogen and its subsequent utilization during performance. Int J Sports Med. 1981; 2(2):114-8. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1034594. View

4.
Rolls E . Sensory processing in the brain related to the control of food intake. Proc Nutr Soc. 2007; 66(1):96-112. DOI: 10.1017/S0029665107005332. View

5.
Berridge K, Robinson T . What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1998; 28(3):309-69. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00019-8. View