» Articles » PMID: 22007664

Orthodontic Care for Underserved Patients: Professional Attitudes and Behavior of Orthodontic Residents and Orthodontists

Overview
Journal Angle Orthod
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2011 Oct 20
PMID 22007664
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To explore whether orthodontic residents and orthodontists differ in their attitudes and behavior concerning the treatment of underserved patients and to investigate how background factors such as the providers' gender, ethnicity/race, and age affect these attitudes and behavior.

Materials And Methods: Survey data were collected from 135 residents in US and Canadian graduate orthodontic programs and from 568 active members of the American Association of Orthodontists. Attitudes toward various aspects of treating underserved patients were rated on a five-point scale, with 1 indicating the most negative attitude and 5 indicating the most positive.

Results: Orthodontic residents had more positive attitudes about treating poor patients (3.02 vs 1.99; P < .001), pro bono cases (3.87 vs. 3.45; P < .001), and patients with craniofacial anomalies (3.64 vs 3.01; P < .001) or mental retardation (3.13 vs 2.72; P < .001) than orthodontists. However, compared to orthodontists, lower percentages of residents intended to treat pro bono cases (73.5% vs 83%; P = .009) and patients with craniofacial anomalies (63.6% vs 82.9%; P < .001) or mental retardation (55% vs 81.5%; P < .001). The providers' gender did not have an effect on these attitudes and related behavior, while ethnicity/race and age of the providers were relevant.

Conclusions: Residents had more positive attitudes concerning the treatment of underserved patients than orthodontists. However, their behavioral intentions did not indicate an increased willingness to provide care for these patients.

Citing Articles

The role of psychology and communication skills in orthodontic practice: a systematic review.

Baxmann M, Barath Z, Karpati K BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):1472.

PMID: 39696160 PMC: 11654430. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06451-6.


Orthodontic treatment of a particular subgroup of children with special health care needs, children with craniofacial anomalies: An analysis of treatment length and clinical outcome.

Taddei M, DAlessandro G, Amunni F, Piana G Angle Orthod. 2015; 86(1):115-20.

PMID: 25849108 PMC: 8603962. DOI: 10.2319/122014.1.


Orthodontic treatment of children/adolescents with special health care needs: an analysis of treatment length and clinical outcome.

Blanck-Lubarsch M, Hohoff A, Wiechmann D, Stamm T BMC Oral Health. 2014; 14:67.

PMID: 24915851 PMC: 4065547. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-67.

References
1.
Lewis C, Ose M, Aspinall C, Omnell M . Community orthodontists and craniofacial care: results of a Washington state survey. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005; 42(5):521-5. DOI: 10.1597/04-100r.1. View

2.
Rich 3rd J, Straffon L, Inglehart M . General dentists and pediatric dental patients: the role of dental education. J Dent Educ. 2006; 70(12):1308-15. View

3.
Formicola A, Stavisky J, Lewy R . Cultural competency: dentistry and medicine learning from one another. J Dent Educ. 2003; 67(8):869-75. View

4.
Mitchell D, Lassiter S . Addressing health care disparities and increasing workforce diversity: the next step for the dental, medical, and public health professions. Am J Public Health. 2006; 96(12):2093-7. PMC: 1698162. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.082818. View

5.
King G, Hall C, Milgrom P, Grembowski D . Early orthodontic treatment as a means to increase access for children enrolled in Medicaid in Washington state. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006; 137(1):86-94. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0026. View